#91: funny: pure black but still fresh and modern I would appreciate one version with (3D) mirroring effects in the black font and in the bubbles (just because I am curious)
#91 and #97: sorry, misunderstanding. I wanted to see a 3D-effect (aqua design, lighting) in the writing and in the molecular structure, but still dark black, e.g. like #42 or #98, not a mirror at the bottom
#112: ok, one last try: version a) please make this logo completely colourful, a little bit like #27; every letter and also the molecule model, in rainbow-gradient colours.
version b) leave the font as it is, but change the molecule model into rainbow-gradient colours.
#133: ok: the bad news: the choice of colors is not perfect. The good news: this kind of approach could really work. The problem with the chosen colors is, that they are too equal, to much blue/purple and too many different colors/rainbow colors within one bubble. Each single bubble (of the visible big 5 bubbles including the middle) should have one main, clear, bright, strong, but different basic color with gradients, eg like (only examples! for the middle tone of the gradient of potential colors). The smaller two bubbles: color what ever you want, maybe pink and orange
blue #0748F1 purple #7804BD red #DE0324 yellow #ECBE06 green #02BF06
The mix is up to you, I only wanted to explain the principle I was looking for.
Hi Jet, it would take too long now to revise the colored versions and I am not sure if this really will add value to the logo finally. But I need to have two additional variants for the black one. Since one of out toys is completely on total black background, #112 does not work now. Can you please a) a version of #112 with a white outline around so that it can stand on black backgrund and alternatively b) prepare a version of #112 in a negative version (meaning white font and white bubbles with gradient)
ok, I think white on black does not work. Neither full tone like #144 nor outline like #148.
Also the colored versions are still not convincing. As I said, this would take too long to find a color set including the right color combination and the gardients and the depth of the colors.
Let´s try a more valuable approach for the version on black background, like you started with #145. Instead of white and black let´s use gold and black, like e.g. #89 did.So exchange the black color of the font and the bubbles with gold. If possible, still keep the 3-dimensional look (keep the lighting and gradients, but now in the gold tones).
Hi Jet, very good, but still not there. Your gold has too much red tones inside.If you compare it with #89 for instance, #149 does not reall y look like valuable gold.
If possible, please try out also a variant in silver-look.
In both cases, gold and silver: it´s not about speed now or just coloring, it´s about precisision. The closer your proposal on black background comes to the look of a valuable metal (element), the better it is.
#154 and #155: Wow!!! I like both very much, but #154 is somehow stronger. So with #112 for white background and #154 for black background I think we have a really good solution.
In #154 there are some minor "transition" areas in the bubbles of the "element" figure which are quite sharp/hard. Ot does not look really like a3D round bubble with lighting (compared to #112, where the 3D effect and the lighting looks perfect). But we could finalize it, if we select your logo as a winner, I assume?
Great work. I now have to consider about finishing the contest with my partner-shareholder in the company.
Hi Jet, #157 does not work, the colors of #154 are much better. It is just a challenge now to harmonize #112 and #154, because lighting and shadow line/light effects are differently now. #157 has a straight horizontal line while #112 has a curved one. Either you adjust #112 in the way like #154 has been done or you do it the opposite around and adjust #154 in the way, #112 has been prepared.
In any event the lighting in the bubbles of #154 needs to be corrected. In the lower bubbles the light does not consequently come from the top. And, as mentioned before, in #154 there are some minor "transition" areas in the bubbles of the "element" figure which are quite sharp/hard. It does not look really like a 3D round bubble with lighting (compared to #112, where the 3D effect and the lighting looks perfect).
Do you think you can solve it in a way, that the black on white proposal and the gold on black one look similar?
This is new optimized for gold version #158 to be more harmonize to #122 and more 3d effect on molecule, and this is #159 just option for #122 with more shiny effect on 3d molecule.
Dear Jet, I like #160 very much, fits allmost perfect to our favourite #112. I have only a really little change request. The lighting on the bubbles/the bowls could be slightly brighter on the top and the transition area at the top could be smoother.
Do me a favor an send a jpg of #160 and #112 with a little bit higher resolution to: werner.kloetsch@googlemail.com. I will put my remarks directly into this picture pointing out the areas I mean, think this will make it much easier for you.
Great, thank you very much. I will check this finally with my colleague now. The decision for the version on black background is between #160 and #164. #164 is much closer to the black on white version, but #160 looks much brighter. #164 is less brigter and less shiny. We now have to decide if we dare to allow the optical difference (would mean #112 plus #160) or if both versions must be equal regarding lighting and texture (which would be #112 plus #164).
I understand what you want, but actually it is hard to make #160 with more soft/blur edge gradient in vector based, it will much easier when the effect make on raster based such as in photoshop, but raster effect is not good for the logo, the consequences is like #164 which is less brighter and less shiny
Hi Jet, think we made it. Thank you very much for your patience. Although I had my doubts, I still have the feeling that #160 works better than all the other variants. So my stomach decided for #160 and I do not care anymore, that it is slightly different to the #112.
I would like to make #112 the winner of the contest and would appreciate, if I could get the files of #160, too.