Hype, your work is amazing. Can we do something to make it stand out a bit more. A bit of "shine" somewhow?? Maybe even experiment a bit with adding a 3rd dimension?? Maybe somehow with that third dimension we could somehow express the "layering of data sets". I make a lot of GIS maps which are composed of layered data sets (streets, pipes, aerial photos, trees, lakes, you name it...anything that can be put on a map we put it on a layer and map it with many other layers that can then be 'toggled' on and off by the map user.
ESRI (www.esri.com) has some pretty good artwork emphasizing layering of maps if you want to take a minute and look.
Thanks for your help with this. It is much appreciated. Feel free to ask questions. Tim
On both #59 and #63, can we do domething to make the colors "pop" a little more. If you look at the currently ranked #1 that color stands out a bit better. I'm not suggesting using that color...just somehow helping yours to stand out a little bit more. I have no idea what time it is where you are at...so when you have some time let's work on dialing these in a bit. Thanks!
Can we please a brightened up version of the colors in #59 but the layout of #86? I like #86 a lot if we can just try a few different color combinations. Thank you so much for your creativity and hard work. Tim
Overall it's an effective logo, particularly I like the: scale, colors, font, alignment
One minor tweak for the text could be to very, very slightly expand (called kerning) the "consulting, LLC" so that the left edge of the "c" in "consulting" aligns to the left edge of the "T" in "Tamarack" above.
Other than that - this is my #1 Choice. Thank you! Tim