Soumya, you continue to surprise. I think #175 is fun, but is likely too stylized a font to convince the group. Our general take on font is something clean and classic - timeless but not too familiar. I don't know if we've found the right thing yet, But anything that could not be used to print a book is probably to eccentric.
Because you have such a range, and I never know what you will come up with next. I'll put this out there, I still have not seen a really surprising use of positive/negative space. Have you read the last comment I made in the general section on "Sensibilities"? there are some abstract ideas that resonate.