Hello Staticdesign, Thank you for your design, you have come up with a really good variety of unique designs. I would like to leave you some feedback that may help. I am after a solid style logo. My first ranked logo is a good representation. It is simple, strong and clearly illustrates the company name. I have ranked your entry #76 in the top 5 because it does show elements of what I am after and it is a unique concept that nobody else has thought of, so well done. It doesn’t quite work for me yet but I believe it has potential and based on the fact you have come up with such a good variety of alternative designs, I think it would be worthwhile to refine #76. A couple of suggestions I have would be to give the company name more prominence and maybe refine the wave in the MPS. I find that my eye is drawn to the wave more so than to the company name. You may also want to experiment with a few different font designs for the MPS I am sure you won't but please be careful not to imitate the number 1 ranked design, because I am after five uniquely different designs. If you remain in the top 5 you will have equal chance of winning with your own individual design because I will be asking friends and industry colleagues to score the 5 final designs and the design that receive the highest overall score will win. Thanks again and good luck.
Hello again, Thank you for the updates but I still prefer #76. I will also have a closer look at #107. In regards to #76, I do prefer the white background. It’s still not working 100% for me at this stage but as I mentioned in the last feedback I think it has potential. Maybe play around with the font. I'm sorry I can’t be of any more help, I have found that many of my suggestions quite often doesn't improve on the original designs so I have been learning to put more trust in the experts like you. It is amazing how small changes can throw out the balance of the original concept. .
Thank you for your paying attention to my work. Added some new adjustment for #76 entry and also some new concepts. Any further suggestions or modifications are welcomed!