Décalage MediasLogo Design Contest

Great job on your designs!

They're exactly what our team is looking for and we would love to see the following changes to make sure that they can be used for the different support that we are targetting.

- The logo should be available in two versions: an horizontal version for the website and a square version to be printed on t-shirts.

- The logo should be available in two versions: a gray scale version for the website and a black and white version to be printed on t-shirts.

Also if you could try adding a small line between the texts that would be great.

Hi again. And thanks a lot for the different variations of the logos!

We really like #70 but we were wondering if you could try with just the "D" an "M" letters in the black rectangle. Because we still think that it is hard to read these letters.

Hi decalagemedias,

I have submitted thinner new entries.
#95 with gradient grey and black,
#96 web 2.0 style,
#97 black and white,
#98 grey scale.

Thanks for your feedbacks. Hope you like it.

"DM" with shadow.

(This comment references Entry #115)

Hi nJoy. Thanks a lot for the different designs!

They're definitely part of our favorites but some of us would like to see how it looks like if you don't merge the "D" and the "M" together. Any chance that you could try with a normal "DM"?

Bonjour decalagemedias,

I have submitted new entries: #146, #150, #151, #152, #164 and #165. Hope you like it.

observe

Hi again.

Thanks a lot for the different variations of the letters, colors and shapes!

Your idea is definitely my favourite but we have a committee of three people deciding for this logo so we don't know yet which one will be chosen.

Just a couple of hours before the end of the contest so I don't know if you will have the time to try the following but if you do that would be great.

We would like to see #152 in horizontal version. Hope you'll have the time to try.

Disappointing for me.

I have submitted new submissions. Hope your committee like it.

My last entry

(This comment references Entry #192)