Entry #122. Very nice design. Is there some way you could extend the silver further into the top of the "R" and flatten it out similar to the top of the "T" so that it makes the top of the "T" flow across to its extension on the top of the "R"? Basically the first 1/3 or so of the top of the "R" would be just like the existing top of the "T" (both color and angle): this would provide for a more recognizable "T". This one has some VERY good potential.
Entry #149. This is very close, except that I think the break at the top of the "T" should remain the same as in #122 and then after the break carry the silver at the top further to the right a sufficient length to give a balanced overall look to the "split" T in 149.
#207. I tend to lost the T and the R due to the lightness of the silver/grey shading which adds depth but loses definition. I like #202 better as it is more defined. The darker blue in #207 might make #202 better if you want to try that. Thanks! Best, Jim.
#215. I like the design except for the large white area immediately beneath where the T and R connect: it seems too big. I also like what you did with "group" re. coloring and placement. Tx, Jim.
#262. The more I look at this, the more I like it. Is the bottom white portion of the "R" intentionally touching the "U" as if there is a "connection" or "linking" of the symbol "TR" to the "Group"? Maybe some minor tweaks but this one just grabs me. I would focus on this one, pretty much at the angle at which it sits, maybe swing it slightly to the right so the white portion of the "R" doesn't touch the "U" and the base of the "T" is a bit closer to the "U" in group (but keep the TR sitting at the same angle). You were right about the angle the first time around: when I look at it I see the word "group" and my eye is instantly drawn to the curve at the bottom of the "R" which makes me look at what first glance appears to be some sort of symbol but on further inspection is the letter T and R. This one will be very hard to beat. Best, Jim.