We look forward to seeing your next designs :-) One more thing on this proposal: the "marketing+communication" headline is too small/not enough readible.
Hi Sebastian, feedback to no. 9: - dark blue is good, maybe a bit stronger (as in the logo ranked 2nd) - we also like the green, maybe a bit brighter - without TM Many tanks & regards
Hi Sebastian We really like the no. 93. Could you give us a negative version (blue background and white font). And can you also make a trial with small letters, using the same font type of no. 93. Thanks and regards
Hi Sebastian The no. 112 is our favourite, could you show us, how it works in a black/withe version? We also would be interested to try other colours than the light green, maybe a warm grey? beige-grey? (to give the logo an elegant touch) or others? Important is, that we can use the logo with the white and the dark blue background. What is the colour number of the blue? (is it a colour on the RAL scale?)
Hi Sebastian Thanks for the new versions. For the dark blue: could you try RAL 5013. We think, the grey and beige for the i are too boring, sorry, that was a bad idea. Could you try again a more gaudy color , eg. RAL 3027 (raspberry) or RAL 1005 (honey)
The version with the black background looks very 'hard', do you think a dark grey would be better?
Sebastian okay, sorry, we thought, we are in the fine tuning phase.... and you are right, we mean the no. 156 (not 155), because we would like to compare the green and red i in the main version of the logo with white background. But this can also wait until the contest phase is over. Best regards