I liked #7 more than my colleague who was clear he would not want to go with that one, so I did not want you to go down the route further. I will not be quick to pull the "thanks, but" lever in general, only if I think it would be helpful. We like #3 but I do not perfer a serif font. Similarly for #2 which the owner of the company does not like as much as i do.
We like #65 with a few caveats. The person looks like a woman with some suggesting the circles are breasts. Maybe it could look more like a child? Also, we have red, orange, and blue (as well as gray/black) in the software today, so perhaps choose something more colorful than gray (yeah, I know what I wrote earlier) such as an orange for the color of Trak so we can see how that might play. This one is definitely a contender but we do not think it is quite right at this point. Thanks.
The primary feedback I am getting regarding #76, which we really like, and others is that they look like they are selling to a more male demographic. The look of #76 would be great for tools, for example. I have no idea how to feminize a logo other than to make it a bit more fun (from my perspective, that is) or with a softer look. We are marketing software, of course, but we want our audience to both trust and love it as software that will work for them. I don't have any great advice other than to possibly tap into your feminine side (smiles). #76 does make it into our finals, but it is likely just too masculine to end up the winner, I'm guessing. Thanks!
#89 #77 and #76 all work for me. I think they would all be great on the web site. I prefer the colors of #89 and I am not sure which of the icons I like best. One of these or some variations thereof could definitely end up the winner. These will go into our finals. Thanks!
My colleague would like to see #77 and #78 with the colors from #89. I think that will give all the different clock/person variations with the font and colors we like best (#89). Thanks!
Several people really like #89. I am not that fond of the arms that look like a bird. I might like #76 a little bit better, but the blue is not close enough to the blue of the web site. Enough people really like #89 that if there were a few enhancements to it to address the "bird arms" (my words, others like it, as I mentioned) and the colors, this is another one that could be a winner. Thanks!
As you can tell, we are down to your recent designs and the recent ones from eastbay. We would like to see the font and color scheme in 146 with the "straight arm" figure from 76. In other words, blue shwoosh, orange person/clock, same blue as 146, but the straight arms from 76. One thing we didn't like as much in 146 was the StayTrak word was too low because of the right curved arm, so with the straight arms you should also be able to raise StayTrak higher as in 76. We like how the swoosh ends at the bottom of the S instead of the top. Related to that, we'd like to see 146 with the right arm pointing up a little higher so you can raise the StayTrak to that position as well (swoosh ending at bottom of s).
and just to clarify, we like evetything about the 146 clock itself as far as the size of the swoosh, its position and the grey background circle size and position - it's just the person/hands and the StayTrak words we want adjusted.
Thanks fof the prompt reply! One thing I didn't explain well is that in addtion to the "very straight" arms, I wanted to see the current 146 still "curvey" but with the right arm curving up a teeny bit more but still staying a curve. That would allow you to move StayTrak up as you did in 170 while keeping the left arm, head, etc. the same as in 146. Does that make sense?