#3 should have 'System Certification' rather than 'Sustainable Event Solutions'. #5 would be good to have ISO 20121 facing the other way (top of the letters to the outside of the circle.
Please don't do any more logos based around the existing three sided circle in the blue/aqua. We are hoping to move away from that, and all your logos are making it look like that is all we are interested in!
We will consider staying with the existing circle, but have created this logo tournament contest to hope to see new designs.
The elements to include are:
- a tick - 'sems' (as how it is written in our current logo - the text only) - ISO 20121 - five stars (removable down to 1 star) - the year, e.g. '2012' next year will be '2013' etc
And then we wish to see a totally new design element to move away from the existing blue circle. Consider that this is for events and for sustainability.
Hi Meegan, Thanks for your feedback so far. I am pleased to participate in your contest. Please always feel free to give us feedback. We are happy to do so.
I think you should stop creating more logos just similar to the previous one. It is not really working. There are enough of the ones you have done now that if we want to go with this style we can choose a couple we like and then get specific.
It is getting quite annoying that you keep putting Sustainable Event Solutions in it when I have said about five times now not to....
We love #16. Could you please do a version that has these words 'Sustainable Event Management System' instead of 'Sustainable Event Solutions'. It will mean the font is smaller - I hope it will fit.
Please take the stars out for this one. (I know - just go with it - we are considering something without stars) and in place of the stars put the year. Can you put 2013 in this time rather than 2012 (as having ISO 20121 and the year 2012 makes it hard to review - we will be all ok once we get past the year 2012!!!)
Ok Thanks @ #78 we can see another version from #16 with 'Sustainable Event Management System' instead of 'Sustainable Event Solutions' @ #79 and #80 we can see another version from #12 with 'ISO 20121' replace the stars and 'System Conformity Assessed' replace 'ISO 20121 System Certification'
Thanks for these updates. re #78 can you please put the year '2013' in the place where the stars are? And also put the word 'CERTIFIED' across the bottom under 'sems' and above ISO 20121
Sorry for this. It's almost perfect! I want it to be just right before I show it to the director as my final recommendation.
Ok thanks We are honored to hear that. @ my #81 and #82 we can see another variation from #78 that 2013 replace the stars and also a text 'CERTIFIED' placed across the bottom under 'sems' and above ISO 20121.
Hi good morning thanks for your feedback above. @ #83 we can see another version from #81 using the blues that are on the website here: http://www.semstoolkit.com/
and #84 using the same color with #83 and we have take the stars out
Thanks so much for doing the blue versions. I think you'll agree with me that the blue looks a bit too full on. But we needed you to do it to first see. However, looking at the website www.semstoolkit.com, I wonder if you can think of a way to do the logo #81 / #85 with blue/s that you think complement the look/feeling of that website? What do you think? Maybe using some of the lighter blue? Maybe having a bit more contrast between the blues? Slightly paler?
Well .. I think it's better if you use color as that we use in entry #81 than if you forced your self to use a color that looks pale and lack in character. Don’t be afraid if your web site will look ugly when you do not use the same colors. Precisely your web site will be more appealing because of its contrast and also created more stronger brand image.
Thanks for your thoughts on this. One of our directors has just told us he is convinced that the certification logo must be in the similar blues to the website, rather than the dark teal green version....
I agree that the dark green is awesome. If you think there could be a blue version however, that matches with the current website colours, let us know.
Thanks again for sending through those links. We are still thrashing out the colours!
@#2 it is a front runner in terms of layout, and I would like to ask if you could please do a deep green version of it exactly - with the wording as it is on the bright blue version.
Also, I hate to asked, but is it possible for you to please do a version of #81 without (sorry!!) the word CERTIFIED, but everything else there - obviously moving 'ISO 20121' up a bit!
Hi I am back again let's look again @ #86 this is the revision base on #81 without eord "CERTIFIED" and #87 the revision from #84 with dark green color