Thank you for joining the contest and for your very good work. How does it work your #259 when it has to be reproduced solid and separated from SEAL? Same tipography than many others. May be an alternative?
Hello, Please, check post placed for the three finalists about your designs general comments. If you want to keep on working for the fonal decission, here are some particular coments about your design: Symbol will reproduce alone carved on the internal face of the packaging cover (foam), carved on the rotor of the watch movement in 6 milimiters big (machine), on the front face of the crown with also 6mm big but with volume made with laser. Your symbol, as it is today, can not reproduce on those three surfaces with no problems to be read or with quality enough. To solve that, we need a more solid symbol. May be, just as an idea, cocle should be a bit thicker, the same than the "S" two halfs edges. We know we are not the designers, and that is provably not the solution. Keep the idea. We like very much the symbol. It talks about quality, precission, sarpness... It is modern but not too much, reliable, and so on. But needs also a bit of consistancy, strength. Our watches dive up to 2.000 meters deep, and that is not possible for a watch nor a watch brand wich in not stron enough. Please, think about a more red (less orange) color. We want to make a final decission as soon as possible. Any question, please let me know. Than you.
We were very happy with your previous symbol. Yesterday indications were about little modifications you could do in order to avoid reproduction problems. If the tipography was the same in all the finalist logos (something to be changed) it was the symbol where we focused to make the finalist selection. There is a general message about tipography. Please, check it out. Thank you,
There seams to happen something extrange with distance between letters. It looks is not the same between S And E than between A nad A or A and L. May be is just visual, but may be corrected.