Our company integrates a number of video technologies into a complete service, and so this symbol, 118, is a good one for us. Can you try to make it a bit smaller, and more in line with the letters? If it gets hard to recognize in smaller form, is there a way to retain this "3D, intersecting pieces" idea at smaller size?
I am reminde by our staff that we need to avoid colord gradients in the font as it causes background colors on the web to bleed into the logo...can you do a version that uses more solid coloring? Small comment, but want to make sure it does not hurt what you have done already.
could you do # 156 using the "red-green-blue" theme you used in the other? We like the colors you chose for this version, but want to see if the "video-suggestive RGB" theme works well. Also, if you have other ideas for the integration symbol, please post them: These two of yours are great, both the cubes and the "curls..."
Also on 156 it would help to see font treatment that is more significant in the color change from one word to the next, as you did with the others...And without the gradient/shading, (I think the gradient looks better, but our site designer says no...)
Now you have mentioned that bg colors can bleed into the logo. Well, that would definetly not happen when the vector file will be exported along with the background. In the end i can re-build the logo in PSD using gradient vector shapes - easy to modify colors - and then place it in the PSD layout, Let me know what you think. Emi
One other request: Can you do the original, blue and grey cube version, (118), with flat colors, and using a symbole that is sized the way you did our current #1, entry 154: In our current number 1, the symbol is smaller, relative to the font. It is a tought call between the RGB and the simpler blue-grey that you originally did. We like the smaller symbol size for sure, and we want to see if the blue-grey version can reduce as well as the colored version.