First, thank everyone for their excellent work. Selecting a winner will be difficult (but, of course, we shall).
Here are some thoughts to help you all do your work even better.
We all like Example #2, the one we rank first, because it is clean and simple. However, the green color does not excite us and the typeface is just O.K. This logo will often appear on print materials in black and white and we wonder how this rendition would hold together in B&W? Also wonder how this design might look if the "News-Talk Radio" were centered under it a la Example #2??
Example #1, which we rank second, is a more traditional approach and very good . . . however the mikes used (as is the mike in Example #3) are old fashioned public address type mikes, not the sort of thing used today in broadcasting. Again, B&W rendition?
Example #5, our ranking is third on this one, looks like a dated, almost retro, design and that's not exactly what we're shooting for. If we're going to use more than one color can it be something bright that has some "pop" to it? The principal color, a Reflex Blue, is fine. As in the first two, how would this reproduce in B&W?
Example #3, which is our fourth ranked design, is attractive, but the over first impression of it just doesn't say a lot, certainly not that we're a radio station.
Example #4, which we rank fifth, is creative and we applaud that . . . but the design is just a little too abstract for someone to quickly grasp on a billboard, TV commercial, etc. "News-Talk" is a phrase that's used together . . . "Radio" would be a seperate element . . . in this design they're given equal weight.
Finally, Example #6, which is rank in last place at sixth and in the "not interested" box, uses a line drawing of a fox. It is innovative, but we don't have a mascot and that's not our identification. Equally important is the fact that Fox Valley Broadcasting is used as the primary identifier. Fox Valley is the corporation which owns WRMN AM1410 -- but it's not something we promote.
Example #7 just popped up . . . we haven't ranked it yet. However, the typeface used is not very corporate or "new-talk" looking.