#63, #64, #65, #66, #67 - Hi crcdesigns, thank you for your submissions. The primary "Q" in these logos reminds us too much of the older Compaq logo. However, if you have any more ideas you would like us to evaluate, we encourage you to do so.
#48, #49, #50 - Hi logeko, thank you for your submissions, and for the explanation of the laptop in the "Q". Before the explanation though, we didn't see it, so we don't think our clients will either. However, if you have any more ideas you would like us to evaluate, we encourage you to do so.
#70, #71, #73 - Hi Alan Graphics, thank you for your submissions. None of your designs really jumped out at us nor portrayed many of the aspects we requested in our contest brief. However, if you have any more ideas you would like us to evaluate, we encourage you to do so.
#84, #85 - Hi Joe Dexter, thank you for your submissions. While #85 did attract our attention, we noticed immediately that you didn't use our correct company name: it is "Services", not "Service". Also, we think the pink background behind our tagline actually hurt the viability of #84. However, if you have any more ideas you would like us to evaluate, we encourage you to do so.
#82, #83 - Hi webspook, thank you for your submissions. We can't put our finger on it, but your designs look remarkably like a popular hotel chain. However, if you have any more ideas you would like us to evaluate, we encourage you to do so.
#90, #91 - Hi eyecatching, thank you for your submissions. We're actually going to pass on these designs, as we find the red coloring too "confrontational". There also seems to be somewhat of a disconnect between the coloring, the graphics, and the fonts used. However, if you have any more ideas you would like us to evaluate, we encourage you to do so.
#87, #88 - Hi SpeedLogo, thank you for your submissions. We feel that the monitor image is overused in our industry - we did like how you incorporated the "Q" with the monitor though. However, if you have any more ideas you would like us to evaluate, we encourage you to do so.
#80, #81 - Hi bluejet, thank you for your submissions. We like the font choice, but the boxy pixels isn't "friendly" enough for our preferences. However, if you have any more ideas you would like us to evaluate, we encourage you to do so.
#77, #78 - Hi maxk, thank you for your submissions. Those stars remind of us too much of the Subaru logo, and are too separated from the wording. However, if you have any more ideas you would like us to evaluate, we encourage you to do so.
#72 - Hi maxk, the "Q" stands out nicely, but overall the design is too simple for our preference.
#76 - Hi bluecherrygraphics, thank you for your submission. We feel that the monitor image is overused in our industry. However, if you have any more ideas you would like us to evaluate, we encourage you to do so.
#68 - Hi signwerks, thank you for your submission. This is a nice design that we could have worked with, but it was submitted too late in the contest. However, if you have any more ideas you would like us to evaluate, we encourage you to do so.
#69 - Hi Sparkhaven, thank you for your submissions. Your design appeared too simple, and didn't portray many of the aspects we requested in our contest brief. However, if you have any more ideas you would like us to evaluate, we encourage you to do so.
#54 - Hi qcssoft, thank you for your submission. We've decided to pass on this design as we're not sure what to do with the golf tee image in the "Q". The font chosen is certainly friendly though. However, if you have any more ideas you would like us to evaluate, we encourage you to do so.
#40, #42, #43 - Hi ulahts, thank you for your submissions. We've decided to pass on these designs as the star reminds us too much of the Subaru logo, and the cross mark in the "Q" looks like a garden slug. We want to portray fast and efficient service, not sluggish. However, if you have any more ideas you would like us to evaluate, we encourage you to do so.
#92 - Hi yesk, thank you for your submission. This is a nice design that we could have worked with, but it was submitted too late in the contest. However, if you have any more ideas you would like us to evaluate, we encourage you to do so.