Hi Hart - I want to thank you again now that we've closed our contest. I'm sorry to say that your design did not finally win, but we ranked it 2nd. I'll explain why, and hopefully this will help a little. The team choosing the final designs all believe #80 was very strong, so we tested it in context - on plain and busy backgrounds, and integrated into creative ideas. We then showed some of these potential treatments to dozens of people outside the church to see how they reacted, as well as to many inside the church. What surprised us was the number of different ways people interpreted the image. Where we saw arms out, others saw arms in, up or down. This created a very ambiguous feel to the logo, which was nice because lots of people found their own interpretations attractive. However, we struggled to think of examples of good logos elsewhere which were as ambiguous as this design appeared to be. We weren't afraid of pioneering with this, so it remained a front runner until our final decision meeting, when we realised in practice how difficult it would be to make a clear point to an audience using the logo, or elements from the logo, when people in an audience saw the image so differently. We would fail to engage people like this, and as our decision-making vicar decided we that we are more about being clear than being ambiguous, we went with a different idea in the end. I must encourage you that we still love the shape and the novelty of the design, and feel that it will be a perfect fit for another organisation, but ultimately not for us. I have really enjoyed working with you, and have recommended you to other people seeking to commission logos in future. Best wishes, Bern