New Strategies GroupLogo Design Contest

option 01

(This comment references Entry #31)

option 02

(This comment references Entry #32)

option 03

(This comment references Entry #33)

Creative, thanks for your submissions. I really like entry 31.

Is there a chance to add a divider "I" between the tagline words "New Thinking " and "New Tactics" and remove the "New Strategies" portion of that tagline so that it reads "New Thinking I New Tactics."

Also, would you mind trying another version of entry 31 where we actually put the tagline above the title of the company?
(i.e.) N

New Thinking I New Tactics
NEW STRATEGIES GROUP

Also, can we see what #31 would look like with a more modern "N" - perhaps cursive? Thanks!

changes incorporated.....hope they are upto your requirement.....i have paced a dash between the tagline instead of dividing it.....i thought it will work better this way.....

(This comment references Entry #35)

cursive font logo

(This comment references Entry #36)

Creative Space,

Very strong entries. Thanks!

Is it possible to look at #'s 31, 35 and 36 without the gradient coloration (i.e. making it one full shade of blue). Printing gradient colors can be a challenge...

Thanks!

Creative,

Another idea is bringing the "N"outside of the box a bit - somehow showing that New Strategies Group thinks and acts "outside the box."

one color with "N" little bigger

(This comment references Entry #44)

changes as requested

(This comment references Entry #45)

changes incorporated

(This comment references Entry #46)

Creative,

Thanks for the changes. Entry 46 is clearly on of my favorites.

Thanks!

one more idea

(This comment references Entry #58)

Creative,

On Entry 46, is there any chance to find a more masculine, cursive "N?" My partners are concerned it might not be masculine enough.

Thanks so much!

NSG in my style

(This comment references Entry #76)

Creative,

Entry 76 is a nice play! Can we try it without the red on the lettering and perhaps making the letters a little less futuristic and a tad more elegant. Great thought on your part!

NSG another attempt

(This comment references Entry #101)