I like the font used in #29, #30 and #31. I like the idea of using eyes or an eye as well. But for it to work it might need an eye wich is more recognisable or maybe two eyes and part of a nose and eyebrows. But then you have a person. Maybe just use two big blue eyes. That will get attention I don't know, just free floating I guess. And the white line (wich acts as a really thin striketrough) I don't think it works.
I like what you did. And at the same time if I look at your portfolio or the tournaments porfolio, I guess my logo doesn't stand out the way I feel it should. You know, maybe I want a bit of a bold shiny American logo, saying we're big, we're good, we crush the competition. :)
I like what you did for webster technologies, the logo has three parts. Clear and simple, I like that. Don't get me wrong I also like what you did for liquid soul, wich seems much more elaborate.
The question is (I think) what could go nicely with the words (logos).
I think the logo could benefit a lot from some depth.
Thank you very much. Is indicated by my ranking I like your new design(direction)s. I like #55 an it's variations better than #66 and it's variations.
The only thing that bothers me a bit is that both new designs to me have somewhat the association with photographers. And as you know we are an internetagency. So I love the look. But I am not sure if it's right for an internetagency. I also don't have an idea what you could do about that. But I wanted to let you now.