Luxious DesignLogo Design Contest

Here are some upscale entries that I hope you like. Thank you - Kent

(This comment references Entry #39)

Here are some upscale entries that I hope you like. Thank you - Kent

(This comment references Entry #40)

Here are some upscale entries that I hope you like. Thank you - Kent

(This comment references Entry #41)

Hi Kent,

Thanks for your entries!

We think you may be on to something with #40. (#39 is too vampire-esque, and #41 looks like a sportscar emblem).

#40 still feels a little too "medieval" somehow -- maybe it's a little to "dark" or "goth"?

We need to find a way to tie it all together, or maybe ditch the "coffee stain" idea and start over. At the very least, we should consider a contemporary sans-serif font with it.

There's definitely something intriguing to us in your initial designs, though. We'd be really interested to see what you come up with using a san-serif word-mark type logo instead.

Thanks!

Here is another entry that I hope you like.
Thank you - Kent

(This comment references Entry #76)

Here are a couple other variations.

(This comment references Entry #77)

And another. Thank you

(This comment references Entry #78)

Hi Kent,

#76, #77, #78 are a bit too simple for us. Additionally, the highlighting on the circle makes it look like an eclipse, which isn't quite what we're going for.

We'd still like to see you expand on #40. The biggest problem with it is that "Luxious Design" is tiny compared to the image--it's completely overshadowed be the huge graphic. We also would love to see a different font.

The LD also just kind of "hangs out" in the middle of the circle. Is there a way to tie that in to the whole logo more somehow?

Thanks!

Here are some variations.
Thank you - Kent

(This comment references Entry #131)

Here are some variations.
Thank you - Kent

(This comment references Entry #132)

Here are some variations.
Thank you - Kent

(This comment references Entry #133)

Revised entry

(This comment references Entry #203)

revised entries

(This comment references Entry #352)