Thank you so much for the compliment and the invitation to your contest.. I have uploaded 2 variations on the design for your logo.. Entry #89 is abstract for photography and entry #90 is the beautiful flowers that u love :)
Please let me know what you think.. I will be happy to modify the logos for you :)
On #94, I am wondering what that would look like against a dark portrait (down in the signature corner). The white might stand out too much. Any ideas?
Ok, and also, could you put 94 and 95 on black background to see what it would look like on a portrait? It's a neat design. Very clean and understated, yet sweet and honest.
I have uploaded a new variation of #137 - I have changed your name to a more friendly and welcome font. I thought, since you are working with children I wanted to show a more warm and playful, and less strickt and formell font, but still keep the professional look to the design. The colors are looking good and discret on both light and dark background. #190
On this one I have added a frame behind the flower to represent that you specialize in portrait photography. #191
Hi Anne, Thanks for your submissions and hard work. I don't really like that font. It's too bulky. Thanks, tho. :) Also, the square is a no-go also, Sorry :)
Ps. I make them only in gold for now.. You can of course have it any color you like! But gold looks great on photos.. (My father in law is a photographer and he uses only gold in his signature) Its really discret, but recognizable :)
Just wanted to let you know that its night time all the way over here in Norway now, so im going to get some sleep.. But if there is anything you would like to see different just let me know and I will upload tomorrow morning :)
What are your thoughts between 213 and 216. It was my daughter who suggested the "unsquished" font. But I don't know what I think. 216 looks good, but I would like your opinion. The 213's font look nice, too. I think the bigger photography word also looks good. But what do your eyes say? How do they FEEL? J