We like #102, now in the lead. However we've got two issues with it that we're hoping you can help solve. First is the font, it's just too bland. Can you do something about that? If you look at some of our other high-ranking choices you might get a feel for what we like (since I can't point you to specific design elements from other designers)
Also, I know #105 is the same in reverse, and it works. But is becomes very simple then -- which is fine. However, for use at the top of our web site we think it would be too simple. Any ideas on how we can use #102 on the top of the site (www.irbmanager.com) with the dark background that's there now? Maybe in an oval or something? We like what you did w/the Stonewood Flooring logo oval.
Updated.. #193, #194, #197, #198 (on white Background) #195, #196 (header of the website as a background)
I prefer the logo #196, well suited for websites and does not look flat
I think the oval shape is not suitable when used as the background of the logo, this makes the logo look more busy, especially if placed on the website.
The "oval" comment was just an idea, I think you've crushed that idea and blown it away with what you did instead! Awesome! Couple internal approvals to get early next week and we'll be all set.
One thing, on #196 the horizon through the middle of the "Manager" is a bit strong, almost a line instead of a gloss. Can that be toned down some?
Dude! Where's all your logos go? You withdrew the one in the lead? Huh? We were basically done! I hope this was a mistake. Please let me know what's up.