Owner really liked #18. Only thing is how could we incorporate the other two crops - wheat and soybeans into the design - and would it loose the effect that you currently have if we were to try and add the other crops? Overall very nicely done.
#12 was nice but next to #18 its not quite as flashy. Thanks for the submissions.
I tried a few different versions showing the 3 different crops. None of them were worthy of showing. They were just too busy. And the logo was already on the verge of being busy. It just pushed it over the top.
So I chose to zoom out and show 3 non-specific fields. I then simplified the overall treatment so that it would look good reduced down and would be more cost effective to print using (3) spot colors.
The owner really liked #18 with the corn - so much so that he said - "Maybe we don't need to show the other crops." I understand that you think the other crops would be too busy. We'll have to think on the field variance but these are definitely in our top two.
I agree. Being too literal can make your logo unnecessarily complex.
If you end of choosing #18 I'll do a simplified version for 3 or 4 spot color printing. The 4 color process version will not work for all of your printing needs.