Hi there, You are doing wonderful work. Thank you! I love the simplicity of #21 ... maybe the writing of GLOBAL could be a little bit bolder? I love that "arts connection" just kind of disappears and the entire focus is on GLOBAL. #9 is great for having movement, and I also like #23 for the rough circle around the entire logo. Going forward, could you try different people in a circle? Right now, yours are the best ones ... but they aren't quite perfect. For example, in #9 I think one sees their stomachs too much - if that makes any sense. Could you maybe try some extremes, to see what works? I would just love those people holding hands to be really beautiful since that is at the center of the logo. THANK YOU!
hi there .... yes, the fine tune #28 is nicer. thank you!! and i really appreciate you also developing another version #26 with other people. we probably should just use a "symbolic" figure (no dresses or hats) ... as some cultures might not be accepting of - for example - shorter skirts.
i've uploaded a lot of reference images (i love 1.jpg, without the blue globe underneath!) ... i think it might make sense to focus entirely on developing the "O" and then maybe revisit the fonts and writing.
also, on #28 (which are currently my favorite people!) ... could we try maybe adding a few more people and then having one somehow emote? like there is an actor standing in front of his audience ....
yes, definitely prefer this version. THANK YOU! question: could you try placing the "O"-shape and the people from #37 into #38?? i love the people in that version a little bit more, and not sure if the surrounding "O"-shape would also work in #38.
wonderful work!! thank you. #59 is the clear frontrunner. i'm apologize but i don't think that the actor #53 is working ... and that is okay. it was worth a try. for #59: i'm not sure if it looks too much like it's for children, with the vibrant rainbow colors .... could we try making it a bit more serious -- either (a) maybe doing the "O" in a single color, different from GL BE? or (b) using more subdued, serious colors?? for #56: i'm still drawn towards maybe having the "O"-shape underneath the people, but this O is much too wide ... a single line would be sufficient. this looks like a life ring from a boat. maybe we could combine #59 and #37? i love the "O" shape in #37, but the script is too playful ... i don't mind that it is lowercase, but the font feels too casual. does that make sense?
i'm in LOVE with #66 and #71 ... they are gorgeous!! as i'm starting to think that the "O" alone could be like an icon for the whole organization (without GL BAL), i am tempted to think that the O-ring underneath the people is a good idea. somehow ties it together beautifully. very minor changes: (1) could you somehow make the black line of the "O" SLIGHTLY thinner ... it just looks a bit too heavy. and maybe the feet of the people can be a little bit closer to the line? i do like some white space between the feet and the O, but it seems wide now. maybe make the people a little big bigger .... i do not mind if the O really "pops" out ... so that it is noticeably bigger than the remainder of the word. (2) could you maybe try a bourbon red ... like a royal dark red, like color # 990000?? i do really really like how you have a darker color in the front and a lighter version in the back. that's beautiful. THANK YOU so very much.
FANTASTIC work ... thank you so very much!!! since i'm not the only one making the decision, i have to wait for my partners to give input -- but i'm VERY happy with the current version. really beautiful!!!! wonderful.