SiRAMOLogo Design Contest

Thanks for the rank, let me know if there is some revision you might want to see, I am (almost) always online.

I would like to know what are your thoughts on my logos, I mean, from 1st to 8th it must mean something, or maybe you changed your mind. Anyway, I am willing to develop this concept further or to work on new ideas.

fk,
your concepts are very impressive. don't be discouraged by the change in rank...chances are it will change several more times before this time is up. this log will be applied to a steel surface so we have to be very careful on how we choose detail, color, etc. #96 says to me class, quality, and prestige. Thank you very much for your efforts on our project! Please keep them coming...

*logo.....not log.

Thanks for your inputs, I'll be working on these ideas and more.

The lettermarks are a bit to classic, would like to see something a bit more modern or abstract.

#219 please turn the abstract S white and try different placement, also add the word scissors under Siramo.

Ok :)

Here it is.

(This comment references Entry #231)

#231 can you make the siramo font a little thicker and the scissor font a little shorter not the same length of Siramo?
also if you want to move around the placement of the abstract "S" shape.

#231 wish the Siramo font had a smaller "I" with no dot. Wish i could see the word scissors better and it was centered under "Siramo" also Siramo could be bolder or letters closer together.

getting there. #239 is good placement of the abstract S. But can you center SCISSORS literally under SIRAMO (like you did in #237). Keep the font bold, and make the I a little smaller, but not lower case.

Centered SCISSORS, the "i" is not so small now and the SIRAMO is bolder.

(This comment references Entry #249)

Another variation, letters are closer (more readability) and the proportion ration between mark and text was also revised.

(This comment references Entry #250)

Mark is slightly thinner and added some metalic gradient.

(This comment references Entry #262)

Variations.

(This comment references Entry #292)