Biologic Patent LandscapesLogo Design Contest

Thanks for the submissions. On color: This logo has to be very highly professional; we are looking for a look & feel that is modern but serious and sophisticated. So we need stronger, more assertive color and typography. Also, could we stack the 3 words, and let's get rid of the tagline for now; we'd like to focus on the corporate mark and name first, then add the tagline at the end. Thanks so much for your work.

See comments #197

#196 #197

Please check, thank you.

Hello: Still really liking this; could we now look at typography and color—we'd love a more modern look & feel to the type. How about sans serif, and positioned to the right as you have done in some others (I don't think we ned the vertical line separating mark from type)....and here, the word "landscapes" is too small relative to the other 2 words. Goal now is to get the type looking more "modern" and avoid looking like landscaping company; and to start color exploration. Thanks very much!

Do you like shield?

#123 #128 #129
Please check, thank you.

Really cool and glad to see this treetrunk again! Maybe explore some broader canopies? We loaded up some graphic samples earlier this evening into the creative brief. Thanks.

We also still really like your clever DNA tree trunk...but not the canopy. Exploring other ways to depict the canopy for this one would also be worthwhile. Thanks.

We are still loving this one. What would make it ideal would be to work in the idea of "protecting," perhaps by adding a shadow under the tree. For this reason, placing the logotype to the right as you have done in some versions might also make sense.

We are not interested in using "BPL," but thank you.

Hello, thanks for the continued submissions. This one looks a little too "playful." Also, please see updates to the creative brief in the Discussion section—we need to avoid looking like a landscape business, and all 3 words in our name are equally important and should be portrayed as such (so "landscapes" shouldn't be portrayed as such a smaller/lesser word).

This is a better shape, though...the other issue is that some of the other renderings look kind of like lamps vs. trees.

Hello: We're really not liking that blurry-looking tree canopy...would really be interested in seeing a different rendering approach to the canopy. Thank you.

Please see feedback on #21

See comment for #28

Hello: We really like the clever tree trunk; but not the canopy. Would be interested to see other ways of depicting the canopy. Thank you.

#28 please check.

thank you.

We like this excapt that it looks weirdly cut off at the bottom and kind of blurry. And it may look a little "blobby" when used at very small size. Wondering if a different "look" to the canopy would work better—one that allows for more "white space"?

Thanks; this looks great.

Hello: We'd like to see all logos on white background. Thank you.

Hello: We'd like to see all logos on white background. Thank you.

Also really like this one; the tree canopy evokes proteins. Thank you.

This one is clever! Thank you.