Sunardi, thanks . . . you do beautiful work. The symbol looks a little confusing to my eye -- at first glance it looks like a snail! But I like your colors and font and I'd love to see another attempt. Best regards, Linda
I'm curious to see what the logo would look like if it were rotated so the long flat side is on the bottom and the little 'blip' on the left is removed. Linda
Sunardi, I really like the symbol a lot now . . . but the font is so boring! I was looking at your profile . . . could you do something more interesting, creative, and contemporary with the font?
I know, perhaps the Serif font of this type are really overdone and less eye catching in this way. I really like to hear your further opinion on the new revisions.
Sunardi, thanks so much, I like this better, though to my eye it looks as though the symbol should be a bit closer to the words. Looking at some of your previous work, some of the fonts I like are the ones you used for Geriatric Resource, Rosslyn, Elite, Sweeney -- I know those are all very different, but just seem a bit more interesting than what you now have for AudiaHealth. Possible to try to be a little more daring?
Also, curious to see how it would look with the symbol on top, now that it has been rotated. Thanks a million for your excellent work! Linda
One thing that I concern about this font family (#87) is the readability of the "t" in Health. Even though the "Heal...and the rest" itself has been readable as health in our mind. I'm sure you have your own opinion.
Hi, Sunardi. One thing I like about 87 is that the symbol is a bit closer to the lettering. I like the font, but because it is less bold I'm a little concerned that it might be hard to read on a business card. Possible to see "AudiaHealth" in black? Also, on a business care the slogan probably would be way too tiny . . . could you please show me what it would look like with the slogan removed?
I really appreciate your great work on this! Linda
Also, Sunardi, could I please see #60 with the symbol pulled in closer to the words? Somehow 87 seems to look better as a whole, though 60 is easier to read. Linda
Sunardi, I like the cleaness of not having the slogan. Could you please show me 124 without the slogan? Also, I had sent hex color codes that we are using on the website . . . the ocean green is too green, I'm afraid, though it is very pretty. Are you able to make use of the color codes I sent?
I have compared the colors you provided on the brief: And I figure it out that: 405E7F is the ocean green you're referring to, and it could be converted to : R64, G94, B127 (RGB) and C81, M61, Y31, K11 (CMYK) and it's darker than my previous color profiles.
Did I figure it right? (Reference entry #130). Thank you.
Sunardi, thanks so much. I like the color values of #125, with the font in ocean green the best; however, I think that the font of #124 is easiest to read. Could I please get this with and without the slogan? It looks as if you shift the "Audia Health" line slightly up when you do't have the slogan below. Again, thanks! Thanks! Thanks! Linda
Do you mean that I shifted the "Audia Health" line slightly down when I remove the slogan? Yes I did, I considered this to keep the balance look of the typograph with the graphic. But of course it's just my opinion.
Here the revision of #124 without the slogan and the "Audia Health" kept remain in its place. #145.
Should I adjust the color of #124 and #145 to #125?