Hi Cliff,
Thanks for getting back to me. Your feedback is helpful!
First, yes, I will provide EPS and JPG, and I'm happy to tell you the font used and give you a link to purchase it. I can't hand over the font. You'd have to buy a license to use it. This is standard practice.
Second, regarding the number of colors... It's kind of a toss up. In printing, you'll definitely pay less if you use spot colors, and I can do that if that's your preference. But this only saves you money to a point. Spot colors are pre-mixed inks. If you use one color or two colors, you'll save money. If you go to three spot colors, you might as well be printing in 4-color.
4-color is an industry term that doesn't necessarily mean your print job has 4 distinct colors. It means that you're using process color or CMYK (cyan, magenta, yellow and black -- hence, the term 4-color) mixed to make all the colors in your project. Any printing job that includes color photography is a 4-color process job. So if your logo has 2 spot colors and you put it in a brochure with a color photograph, you'll be paying for 4-color process anyway.
If you want to print things like business cards, door hangers, posters, mailers, etc., you can get a really good deal with an Internet printer like uprinting.com or clubflyers.com. They do only 4 color process printing in standard sizes on specific types of paper stock, and this keeps the price way down. (For example, you can get 50,000 4" x 6" postcards for around $1000.)
Keep in mind that 2 spot colors doesn't necessarily mean two colors. Any tint of a spot color is still that one color. An example would be #83 -- that's only two colors. #4 is one color. Also, any good logo should be able to communicate in only one color (i.e., all black, no tints). There are many types of reproduction that require it. (For example, if you want the logo etched in glass or metal.)
I hope my long-winded explanation is helpful to you.
I will work on some variations tomorrow and over the coming days keeping in mind what you're looking for. I see what you mean about deconstruction, and I'll work on perfecting that.
Thanks!