Voters: Patricia Whitener, Brenda Jackson, Jessica Sibley, Laurel Kays, Tim Lawrence, Brooke Saari, Dave McGill, JOHN LOEGERING, Daniel Walker, Chris Demers, Maggie Livesay, Julio Perez, Susan Boser, Michele Bakacs, Patricia Townsend, JEF, Agnes Kedmenecz, Robert Kent, Norm Haley, Lynn Barber, Kelli Cody Brookins, Amy Rowe, Blake Carter, Alicia Betancourt, Carolyn Saft, Doug Collins, Andy Lazur, Susie Kocher, Robert Bardon, JL, Dave Jackson, Tina McIntyre, Shiba Kar, Bryan Fluech, Kate Forrer, Ramona M., Viviane, Carol Wyatt-Evens, Sheila Dunning, Kim Morganello, Mark J. Platten, Bob Simmons, Amy Jo Detweiler, Angela Collins, Lorna Bravo, Adam Downing, Cathy Elliott, Maia P McGuire, Tiles, Mary Love Tagert, Dr. Katherine Clements, David Apsley, John Bilotta, m monroe, Jen Dindinger, Ed Brown, Duane Friend, Jenn Volk, Carrie, Susan Haddock, Mark Thorne, Abigail Garofalo, Don Hanley, Mary Lou Addor, Diego, Julianne Schieffer, Karol Kelly, Ashley Belle, Marne Titchenell, Lauren Grand, Mindy Habecker, Jackie Takacs, Megan Weber, Sharon Gamble
Comments
Laurel Kays
Best one
3 years ago
BJ Jarvis
Very good
3 years ago
Eli Sagor
NIce, but not loving the all caps green text.
3 years ago
David Anderson
descriptive
3 years ago
Brooke Saari
I really like the symbols in this one but the green words are a bit hard to read due to color and size (this would be my first choice of the options)
3 years ago
Dave McGill
This shape and large letters may be the most recognizable.
3 years ago
Maggie Livesay
Like but hard to read the words
3 years ago
Jennfier Gagnon
I like this one the best, but wonder how well it will print.
3 years ago
Gregg Garfin
Gets all of the natural resources categories. Will look good at a distance, like in the corner of a Powerpoint slide.
3 years ago
Patricia Townsend
Great! It is bold and easy to undertand. I think you could use a better tree graphic. Also I might like it better with the gold in the center.
3 years ago
JEF
incorporates several natural resource issues
3 years ago
Agnes Kedmenecz
first pick
3 years ago
Tim Campbell
I think this will be the most visible when used across many different applications.
3 years ago
Diana Rashash
I like this one, except for how our name is written out. I'd prefer a blend of it with logo 4 (the other one that has a circle) for the text..
3 years ago
Sanford S. Smith
The full orgabization name is lost here, and the acronym ANREP is too dominant
3 years ago
Robert Kent
My favorite.
3 years ago
Norm Haley
first choice
3 years ago
Lynn Barber
Big, bold, covers all areas
3 years ago
Blake Carter
I like this one the best. It is eye catching and also tells the story of what ANREP is and represents.
3 years ago
Carolyn Saft
this has my vote, crisp, and bold
3 years ago
Doug Collins
This is the cleanest, most contemporary and the one that most easily conveys what the organization is.
3 years ago
Andy Lazur
First Choice
3 years ago
Susie Kocher
I like this one best - it highlights the name most prominently and shows diverse resources
3 years ago
Robert Bardon
Acronym stands out, good color choices, nice shape
3 years ago
Tina McIntyre
focus on anrep, not natural resources, nice images
3 years ago
Shiba Kar
I like this better! Wish if the full name of the association could be in deep green fonts!
3 years ago
Ana Zangroniz
Easiest to read, most appealing visually. 1st choice.
3 years ago
Bryan Fluech
1st choice
3 years ago
Madison Rodman
Seems dated and green letters are hard to read.
3 years ago
Kate Forrer
1st, Love it!
3 years ago
Annie Steel
Do not like the condenses font for legibility
3 years ago
JDK
#3
3 years ago
Shelly Johnson
not my favorite; looks too much like a commercial logo
3 years ago
Chris Jones
This honors the original the most; nice retro feel
3 years ago
Ramona M.
Top choice, visually clean, easy to replicate on association materials
3 years ago
Viviane
Clean design
3 years ago
Carol Wyatt-Evens
My FIRST choice - this one is fabulous! it shows ANREP prominently, but the icons do a great job of describing what ANREP encompasses.
3 years ago
Laura Ney
this one looks a little bit like a chemical company logo, but I think that this one will show up the best and look good, on its own, in different contexts.
3 years ago
Kim Morganello
First
3 years ago
Mark J. Platten
This one
3 years ago
Lorna Bravo
Love this!
3 years ago
Adam Downing
My fav
3 years ago
Shannon Carnevale
Boring Not a fan at all. Looks very clip art-y. Last place.
3 years ago
Cathy Elliott
I like this one best - simple, inclusive - tree is a little odd, pair of trees in the fourth one is better
3 years ago
RL Strnad
Probably my third fave - but if done in grayscale - it loses a lot
3 years ago
Leslie Boby
The words are not spelled out enough, I don't like the black and its too much for small print
3 years ago
Mary Love Tagert
This is my favorite because it is simple and has fewer colors but covers all the bases. Also, you can clearly see the logo acronym and associated words.
3 years ago
T Brant
Nice, bold, maybe too bold.
3 years ago
Dr. Katherine Clements
useful across many mediums because of simplicity
3 years ago
Chris Schnepf
Least favorite. Symbology is a little too cryptic - the tree (?) in the upper left hand corner is awful - looks like a house plant with leaves way out of proportion to the trunk. Also the flame (?) on a pale yellow doesn't work for me. Spelled out acronym is hard to read too.
3 years ago
David Apsley
#1 This is my favorite, make subheading black also so that it is easier to read. Perhaps add a conifer to the tree panel so that it represents eastern and western ecosystems.
3 years ago
Robin Young
this feels like a badge - but it works for marketing
3 years ago
John Bilotta
Favorite
3 years ago
m monroe
this one has 6 icons to the other four... so it shows greater diversity, I guess, though built environment and people are woefully lacking.
3 years ago
Jen Dindinger
This is my favorite. It's bold but simple.
3 years ago
Carrie Stevenson
Too much like the old one. Clip art. I like the colors but it's choice 4 for me.
3 years ago
Leon Porter
This logo catches the eyeL
3 years ago
Christina Restaino
I'm drawn to this one but the words are really small and ahrad to read
3 years ago
Ashley Hoppers
3rd choice
3 years ago
Carrie
First choice
3 years ago
Susan Haddock
#1 Choice
3 years ago
Mark Thorne
Bold and simple
3 years ago
John Punches
My 4th choice
3 years ago
Don Hanley
My favorite
3 years ago
Mary Lou Addor
1st preference for me though with logo #3 colors. Provide more composition and depth.
3 years ago
Diego
I like this one best. The "ANREP" is bold and easy to see and read...that's us.
3 years ago
Julianne Schieffer
Liked the wide open spaces and less detail. also that disciplines represented by symbols. Of course, the range people may feel left out.
3 years ago
HollyO
Not prefered. The icons here are drab, and this is less colorful than the other options.
3 years ago
Marne Titchenell
I like this one the best.
3 years ago
Michelle
This is the second most appealing to me. The bold coloration is eye-catching.
3 years ago
Mindy Habecker
Strong graphic with relevance to many areas
3 years ago
Jackie Takacs
#1 - I like that this logo include wildlife
3 years ago
Keith G. Tidball
Third choice
3 years ago
Megan Weber
This is my favorite, but it is a close tie between the three logos that incorporate icons versus the one that has a more complex graphic image. I think the three with the more simple designs/grahics will scale more easily and it may also be important to have options that can easily be rendered in B&W
Voters: Sarah, Rebecca Barlow, Eli Sagor, Hank Stelzer, Mike Kuhns, Alison Lund , David Anderson, Jennifer Fetter, Steve Yergeau, Michael Abney, Gregg Garfin, Sanford S. Smith, Bence Carter, m dailey, Amanda Gumbert, Jeff Schalau, Roslynn McCann, Madison Rodman, Julie Crick, Annie Steel, Colby Lambert, Shelly Johnson, Chris Jones, Laura Ney, Andrea Lorek Strauss, Victor Blanco, RL Strnad, Melanie Biersmith, Leslie Boby, Kaydie McCormick, Holly Abeels, Martin Wunderly, Linda Seals, Amanda Marek, Carrie Stevenson , Kirsten Conrad, Jacob Putney, Christina Restaino, Norma Kline, Jim Ekins, Matt Russell, Laura H, Michelle, Taylor Clem, UF/IFAS Extension Alachua County, Keith G. Tidball
Comments
BJ Jarvis
Very good.
3 years ago
Eli Sagor
Love this. Professional, focused, clear, and creative.
3 years ago
David Anderson
Strong, simple, easy to identify and read
3 years ago
Brooke Saari
I really like this one but I think it needs an outer structure of some sort. (this would be my second choice)
3 years ago
Jennifer Fetter
I think this is best. It is clean, takes up minimal space and doesn't detract from the full association name
3 years ago
Maggie Livesay
Cool but distracting letters
3 years ago
Jennfier Gagnon
This is ok. Third choice.
3 years ago
Gregg Garfin
Simple and straightforward. Emphasizes NATURAL RESOURCE in the text. Will look good at a distance, like in the corner of a Powerpoint slide.
3 years ago
Agnes Kedmenecz
third pick
3 years ago
Tim Campbell
This is my least favorite.
3 years ago
Diana Rashash
3rd choice. I do like the "Assoc. of..." text block. The text is very legible. The icons are a bit harder to decipher.
3 years ago
Sanford S. Smith
I vote for this one. It is the most balanced and unbiased one way or the other
3 years ago
Terry Gibb
hard to read letters
3 years ago
Andy Lazur
Fourth Choice
3 years ago
Susie Kocher
Clever, though I can't tell what is on the E. Is it supposed to be a fish? No, I guess it's water?
3 years ago
Robert Bardon
Nice appearance but does not highlight who we are as well as Logo 1 does.
3 years ago
Jeff Schalau
I like this one best!
3 years ago
Ana Zangroniz
Not bad, but hard to read if used small.
3 years ago
Roslynn McCann
This is original, creative, visually appealing and covers a lot of major themes NR Extension educators work with
3 years ago
Bryan Fluech
2nd choice
3 years ago
Madison Rodman
Innovative logo while still retaining readability. Love it!
3 years ago
Julie Crick
I think this one is nicely done, neat and tidy. Thinking of replicating on a t-shirt or letterhead.
3 years ago
Kate Forrer
Least favorite!
3 years ago
Annie Steel
This one seems like it would reproduce in the most formats the best. I like the graphics and legibility.
3 years ago
JDK
#4
3 years ago
Shelly Johnson
I like the ANREP with the images embedded, and this it is great the word itself could stand alone.. I would prefer the words on the bottom to look cleaner, it somehow looks crowded.
3 years ago
Chris Jones
This one rocks!
3 years ago
Ramona M.
This is interesting but not sure that folks will connect with the images embedded with letters
3 years ago
Carol Wyatt-Evens
I really like the way ANREP was designed!
3 years ago
Savanna Barry
This is my second-favorite.
3 years ago
Laura Ney
I don't think I like the letters, in the logo, itself being part illustration
3 years ago
Kim Morganello
Third
3 years ago
Adam Downing
3rd choice
3 years ago
Shannon Carnevale
This one is good, too. I prefer the other, but this is a good #2 to me.
3 years ago
Cathy Elliott
Nice design but Wildlife and Fisheries are missing!
3 years ago
Victor Blanco
Simple is always better
3 years ago
RL Strnad
I always think about reproduction on "stuff" like shirts, hats, pens, etc. I really like the clean and clear version shown here. Also doesn't loose much if done in greyscale (all logos should also be looked at in greyscale IMO).
3 years ago
Tiles
Visually I like this one the most, but there is no wildlife represented
3 years ago
Leslie Boby
1st choice Fav- clean design- highlights NATURAL RESOURCES so that people can see what ANREP means, as ANREP only means something to insiders, whereas Natural resources has meaning. I like the little designs and they could do variations of this depending on size of anything.
3 years ago
Mary Love Tagert
This is my next to least favorite.
3 years ago
T Brant
Not sure the art in the lettering will remain discernible as logo is reduced.
3 years ago
Dr. Katherine Clements
like that name is primary focus
3 years ago
Chris Schnepf
Not bad, but would like a little warmer colors (e.g., more red for the "Flame/A"). Like the integration of the symbols into the letters. The brown letter also suggests soil. The fire logo in all of these would suggest a campfire more than fire ecology, but other fire symbols (e.g. a charred snag) may also be problematic
3 years ago
Robin Young
I like this one second best.
3 years ago
m monroe
clever
3 years ago
Jen Dindinger
I don't like this one, the letters are obscured with the graphics
3 years ago
Linda Seals
I love this one and the next one (row of icons above ANFREP linked with the gray circle). I would be happy with either one. The first two, however, look very western US to me, so a big no on those.
3 years ago
Carrie Stevenson
Love the color coordination with the outdoor element. It's eyecatching but simple enough to replicate on shirts/hats/logo items. Also, my 16 and 13 year old kids voted this as coolest, too, so I think it's going to hold its appeal longer.
3 years ago
Kirsten Conrad
Good clean.Appealing.
3 years ago
Christina Restaino
I think this is my favorite but its so hard to choose!
3 years ago
Ashley Hoppers
2nd Choice
3 years ago
Carrie
Second choice
3 years ago
Susan Haddock
#3 choice Too busy in the letters
3 years ago
John Punches
My third choice
3 years ago
Norma Kline
I like this one. it's streamlined
3 years ago
Jim Ekins
I really like the symbols incorporated with the wording. I also like the water resources symbolized WITHOUT a focus on fish.
3 years ago
Diego
Clever, but a little too artistic for this purpose.
3 years ago
Matt Russell
I like this one!
3 years ago
HollyO
This is my second choice. It's interesting to look at, colorful, and conveys a lot of information at a quick glance.
3 years ago
Laura H
I like that you can clearly read what ANREP stands for in this logo, and the graphics are representative of the broad areas of extension of members. And it's visually clean.
3 years ago
Marne Titchenell
This one is VERY close second...
3 years ago
Michelle
I like this one the best! I like that the text is large enough to be readable, and it incorporates the different natural resource icons in a creative way.
3 years ago
Lauren Grand
second choice
3 years ago
Katie Callahan
Beautiful 2nd place! Just unsure if those unfamiliar with the association will get the lettering?
Voters: Kasey Bozeman, Stephanie Butcher, Brittany , BJ Jarvis, Tammy, Amy, Allyson, Jennfier Gagnon, James Morgan, Danielle Rhea, Michelle Atkinson, Marnie Ward, Tim Campbell, Diana Rashash, Andy londo , Tricia Gorby, Paul Pugliese, Terry Gibb, Jessica Warren, Amanda Tedrow, Ana Zangroniz, Holly Campbell, Whitney Prestby, Joy Hazell, Thomas Brewer, Savanna Barry, Abbey Tyrna, Elissa Wells, Mary Salinas, T Brant, Mary Carol Sheffield, Robin Young, Twyla Leigh, Georgia Peterson, Andrew A Kling, Laura Tiu, Bill Hubbard, paulette , Raymond Joyce, HollyO, Katie Callahan, Justina Dacey, Mike
Comments
Stephanie Butcher
The simpler, the better.
3 years ago
Laurel Kays
Close second
3 years ago
BJ Jarvis
Love it Number 1 pick
3 years ago
mark megalos
#2 Could move to #1 with Bolder darker font
3 years ago
Eli Sagor
Nice.
3 years ago
Amy
I think this one is the cleanest! And easiest to print.
3 years ago
Allyson
My favorite
3 years ago
Brooke Saari
This one is too skinny, not enough depth.
3 years ago
Maggie Livesay
Simple very legible but not as engaging as top two
3 years ago
Jennfier Gagnon
This is my second favorite - I think it will print the best since it's relatively simple.
3 years ago
James Morgan
Good
3 years ago
Michelle Atkinson
Love the clean look on this one!
3 years ago
Marnie Ward
clean and fresh depiction
3 years ago
Patricia Townsend
Second choice. I might like better if the tree, sun, ect. graphics were larger.
3 years ago
Agnes Kedmenecz
second pick
3 years ago
Tim Campbell
I like this the best - it's clean and simple.
3 years ago
Diana Rashash
I like the presentation; just wish it had the other two icons (water, wildlife). Otherwise, probably 1st choice.
3 years ago
Sanford S. Smith
This is a little too light and small in regards to our name
3 years ago
Norm Haley
second choice
3 years ago
Andy Lazur
Third Choice
3 years ago
Susie Kocher
I like it but not as well as the one with the full 6 icons
3 years ago
Robert Bardon
Simple logo that highlights our organization well.
3 years ago
Amanda Tedrow
I like the simplicity of this logo, it seems cleaner than the others
3 years ago
Sonia Hall
This would be my second choice, if allowed.
3 years ago
Ana Zangroniz
clean, simple, easy to view. 2nd choice
3 years ago
Bryan Fluech
3rd choice
3 years ago
Madison Rodman
Fresh and simple! I like it. It was a tough decision between this one and the one with the multi colored letters.
3 years ago
Kate Forrer
2nd favorite
3 years ago
Annie Steel
This would be second choice
3 years ago
Holly Campbell
I like this one the best because of its simplicity
3 years ago
JDK
#2
3 years ago
Shelly Johnson
I like this one a lot, it is clean, simple, and scale-able
3 years ago
Chris Jones
Perhaps my least favorite of the four.
3 years ago
Joy Hazell
I like the simplicity.
3 years ago
Carol Wyatt-Evens
This is my second choice - I like it, but not as much as my first choice :)
3 years ago
Savanna Barry
This is my favorite! Is is the most modern and clean-looking. I think the circle around the outside should be the same color blue as ANREP though, it ill pop more against white.
3 years ago
Laura Ney
This is my least favorite. It looks a little too generic.
3 years ago
Kim Morganello
Second
3 years ago
Adam Downing
2nd choice
3 years ago
Shannon Carnevale
Not a fan? It’s not awful.... 3rd to me. It’s clean and easy to read.
3 years ago
Abbey Tyrna
This one most represents membership
3 years ago
Elissa Wells
This one is bright, fresh and simple! Love it!
3 years ago
Cathy Elliott
This is my second choice, but wildlife is again missing!
3 years ago
RL Strnad
Second fave. Clear. Would not loose much in greyscale. Easy to reproduce.
3 years ago
Mary Salinas
clean and crisp!
3 years ago
Leslie Boby
distant 2nd choice- I like words spelled out but the icons are too clip-art-y for me in this format, whereas tied into to the other one, the icons seem fresher.
3 years ago
Mary Love Tagert
This is my second favorite.
3 years ago
T Brant
My vote. I think this has good balance of art and lettering. Maybe slightly bolder color/tint for the written out name lettering.
3 years ago
Dr. Katherine Clements
too simple
3 years ago
Chris Schnepf
Not bad, but spelled out acronym is a little faint. Less inclusive of other disciplines (e.g., range, soils, terrestrial wildlife
3 years ago
Mary Carol Sheffield
This graphic is nice and clean looking and includes graphics to represent the organization
3 years ago
Robin Young
this is a little plain
3 years ago
m monroe
inoffensive, but we can do bettet
3 years ago
Twyla Leigh
This is my favorite.
3 years ago
Jen Dindinger
This would get my second top vote. It's nice and simple but maybe too simple and hard to read.
3 years ago
Carrie Stevenson
I like the simplicity here. Choice #2.
3 years ago
Christina Restaino
I think this is my second favorite.
3 years ago
Ashley Hoppers
4th choice
3 years ago
Carrie
Third
3 years ago
Susan Haddock
#2 Choice
3 years ago
John Punches
My second choice
3 years ago
paulette
this is a clean design I like the one above as well but this one makes it easier to identify name and what it represents
3 years ago
Diego
Second favorite.
3 years ago
HollyO
I vote for this option. It's colorful, the icons are easy to interpret, and the letters are easy to read.
Voters: Shaun Tanger, mark megalos, Nicole Pinson, Marina, Jerry Iles , Shelly Krueger, Ken Gioeli, Karen Bennett, Dan Fagerlie, Jule-Lynne Macie, Tatiana Borisova, UF, Kathy Smith, Doug Zemeckis, Sonia Hall, Haley, Erin Garrett, Brendan Whyte, JDK, Armando J. Ubeda, Michelle Scarpace, Shannon Carnevale, Kristin, Chris Schnepf, Karnita Garner, Mary, Leon Porter , Steve Quarles, Ashley Hoppers, John Punches, Gary Wyatt, Andrew Holden
Comments
BJ Jarvis
Like it but looks a little federal-state-ish
3 years ago
mark megalos
LOve the clarity and reprintablity #1
3 years ago
Eli Sagor
The campfire and fish are a bit off... Rec is part of what we do but not that much.
3 years ago
Amy
This one looks too western focused to me...
3 years ago
Brooke Saari
This one is nice but not inclusive of the coastal aspect and would be hard to see in small form
3 years ago
Maggie Livesay
Like but rather busy
3 years ago
Jennfier Gagnon
Too detailed for small printing.
3 years ago
Shelly Krueger
favorite
3 years ago
Karen Bennett
Might be the hardest to copy, but it is the most appealing.
3 years ago
Dan Fagerlie
my preference as the combination of trees water and wildlife with a upward arrow showing a positive trend and forward thinking :-)
3 years ago
Jule-Lynne Macie
I like this but would take the tents and camp site out as that doesnt really have anything to do with Extension or this association.
3 years ago
JEF
not everywhere has mountains!
3 years ago
Agnes Kedmenecz
fourth pick
3 years ago
Tim Campbell
I like this, but fear that it is too detailed to show up well when used.
3 years ago
Sanford S. Smith
This is nice but too busy for most applications. It is also too western Rockies looking.
3 years ago
Tatiana Borisova, UF
I like this logo - it focuses on nature and our experiences there!
3 years ago
Terry Gibb
too busy
3 years ago
Andy Lazur
Second choice
3 years ago
Susie Kocher
OK, but may not resemble most peoples' natural resources
3 years ago
Robert Bardon
Appears to be to detailed for a logo. Looks nice but comes off more as a camp patch.
3 years ago
Tina McIntyre
no
3 years ago
Ana Zangroniz
Feels too forest-y.
3 years ago
Bryan Fluech
4th Choice
3 years ago
Madison Rodman
Like the vintage look of this one, but it might be difficult to use across different platforms and at a small size.
3 years ago
Kate Forrer
Feels too much like a federal agency!
3 years ago
Annie Steel
This is nice but would be not as nice on reverse blocks of color since it has the reverse in it.
3 years ago
JDK
#1
3 years ago
Shelly Johnson
not scale-able, as too detailed, also will not translate to b&w
3 years ago
Chris Jones
Beautiful, but not representative at the national level.
3 years ago
Carol Wyatt-Evens
this one looks more like a BASS outlet or outdoor company logo (but it is eye catching!)
3 years ago
Laura Ney
This one is the most attractive, to me, but, will be harder to see when reproduced on different materials and different sizes
3 years ago
Kim Morganello
Fourth
3 years ago
Adam Downing
least fav
3 years ago
Shannon Carnevale
I love this one!!! This makes me think of a park patch, I want to go there. I want to work with those people!!
3 years ago
Cathy Elliott
Too busy for my taste.
3 years ago
RL Strnad
Too cluttered and difficult to reproduce. We don't have mtns like that in the south.
3 years ago
Leslie Boby
Wayyyyyyy too busy, and would be extremely hard to see anywhere small, feels just like camping, not like natural resources
3 years ago
Mary Love Tagert
This one is my least favorite because it is busy. Plus, the mountain doesn't represent all parts of the country or each state.
3 years ago
T Brant
Too busy. Details will be lost when shrinking down to use in small areas.
3 years ago
Dr. Katherine Clements
too busy, detail won't always translate well
3 years ago
Chris Schnepf
I like this one best, especially the warmer colors. A little busy perhaps, but it tells a story: suggests an ecosystem, in addition to parts. Also shows human presence and forage (range, especially with mountain in back). Take out the campfire and put a flame front at the base of a charred snag at the left or right side of the trees?
3 years ago
Robin Young
it's busy but I like this one best
3 years ago
m monroe
too much like a DNR from the 50s.
3 years ago
Karnita Garner
best graphics
3 years ago
Jen Dindinger
The graphic on this one is too busy
3 years ago
Amanda Marek
May not be easily replicated on marketing material
3 years ago
Carrie Stevenson
Very cool but small detail hard to reproduce on a logo item. Looks like national parks, but not like coastal areas.
3 years ago
Christina Restaino
I really like this one but I think it looks a little more dated.
3 years ago
Ashley Hoppers
First choice!
3 years ago
Carrie
Fourth
3 years ago
Susan Haddock
Too countryish - we are urban too
3 years ago
John Punches
I like this one best, but it may be more challenging to use on apparel, etc.
3 years ago
Abigail Garofalo
This is my second choice
3 years ago
Diego
Not a fan of the use of artwork for this particular purpose.
3 years ago
HollyO
Not prefered. The details of this logo would be hard to see when shrubnk to a small size.
3 years ago
Marne Titchenell
Beautiful but the scene does not capture the entire US.
3 years ago
Michelle
This one has too fine of detail to show up well in a variety of different formats and uses.
3 years ago
Mindy Habecker
not all live and relate to mountains and pines
3 years ago
Katie Callahan
Love this, but too complicated. Wonder if the artwork could be used on the back of a t-shirt? So lovely!