That isn't what my wife means. Remove the bars from the leaf and replace inside the leaf where the bars were with TSM. Instead of having the TSM under the leaf.
We have had a lot of feedback stating we need the TSM in the logo. The 103 design is rated first by our friends with comments "can you add the TSM" in the comments. That is what we're trying to achieve. It is also our favourite design so we are trying to figure out if it will work with the TSM or not. If not our decision will be 103 or 171/175
Like the grey better than the dark sales and marketing in 170. Is the TSM/leaf more compressed in this one than 170 or are we starting to see optical illusions. If it is we prefer the less compressed version.
Sorry, don't remember seeing it...we commented on 173...can we try it replacing the lines though...the feedback we've gotten is that TSM needs to be somewhere in the logo as well as Tamarah...
I thing we prefer the lighter grey underneath but it's hard to tell unless it is blown up. This has received the second most votes on our survey. My wife & I like it because we may be able to use the leaf/TSM part without the Tamarah in some instances. In the end we may have to put them both in a hat and draw to pick the winner.
You have done a great job so far and have been a pleasure to work with!!
Comments coming back from our survey, suggest that TSM should be included...could you replace the lines within the maple leaf with TSM and see how that looks.
Like the shading to include the A...but can you go from light on the T and H and end with the darker in on the A...see if it stands out better against the maple leaf...also...the comments we have gotten back from our survey is that TSM should be included as well...anyway you could work that in
what we'r envisioning here is Tamarah in grey. The A in the leaf wouldn't be negative. It would be grey surrounded by a red leaf.. Is that a clearer picture?
This appeals to the no special marks on the m - but we like the red, can we see that. Also, like the red in Tamarah in 104 can we use that shading for the red leaf
Thanks, Keep going back n forth to see which one is better. "I wish there was a way to pick two logos to blow up at once for comparison." both have different strengths in my opinion
Like the varying colours on the leaf & letters. Like the TSM in the leaf. Wife is asking to ditch checkmark. Can we try this design without the checkmark but with something else to snazz it up. differnt font, a different unique thing instead of the checkmark etc.
Wife is not a fan of the checkmark, I think that is becoming clearer. These variation is not the best of the bunch we've seen so moving to the no thanks pile
It's a chew on it for the night one. We don't dislike it but it doesn't make us go wow either. Not very descriptive I know. Hopefully I can articulate better after some sleep.
Like that the red really pops here, just not sure about black business cards. the salient details would likely be white? I don't think they'd be red or they's mess with the logo... Sorry just thinking out loud, hoping that helps in some way.
ok things are happening fast now - sorry would have commented on the most recent one. Colour to the "thingys" improved my wife's outlook on them but she is struggling with what they are or why they're included.
She likes design 35 better. Do you think different "thingys" that make sense to her might work?
Wife and I are debating. If the bottom is red the checkmark likely shouldn't be red.. Maybe another colour is my thought (wife mentioned gold after some discussion), ditch the checkmark is hers. My concern with that is boxy letters surrounded by a maple leaf. The checkmark adds volume/texture in my opinion.
This is appealing. I think it would be better if the bottom of the maple leaf was the same colour as the top. We are both visual. Do you want our thoughts regarding colour or is that at the next stage. Thinking red & grey
Thanks for responding so quickly and trying to capture our requests. We've never done this before so I hope we aren't making mistakes by providing suggestions...
The red & blue doesn't provide the reaction we're looking for. Not sure about the S. Is there another way to present it? We feel it looks a bit like a snake
we like the idea this presents. It has multiple uses. we're already thinking it would be good to have this and just the TSM part as separate files, not sure if/how that works.
Like the S and M and like the idea of something outside the box. Only thing it's missing is the Canadian. Maybe an orange maple leaf instead of the leaves?
surprised that the full name is appealing. we thought it might be too large. like the M, reminds us of the mountains out west (had to look a few times to get this though). We are hoping for something distinctly Canadian. Like the arrow
Comment Activity
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Hope to pick the winner by this time tomorrow
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
We have had a lot of feedback stating we need the TSM in the logo. The 103 design is rated first by our friends with comments "can you add the TSM" in the comments. That is what we're trying to achieve. It is also our favourite design so we are trying to figure out if it will work with the TSM or not. If not our decision will be 103 or 171/175
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Is there a difference we should be seeing?
Can we replace the bats with TSM to see what that might add or take away from the design.
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
I mean if you like #103 and #171 you can get both.
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
You have done a great job so far and have been a pleasure to work with!!
Withdrawn
Please check revisions #172 #171
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
what if there was a letter in each leaf extension TSM...
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Hibban
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Can tamarah be different shades of grey so we can see the A, it's kind of lost here. keep the leaf the same.
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
I've submitted some new entry, please check and let me know what do you think?
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
She likes design 35 better. Do you think different "thingys" that make sense to her might work?
Withdrawn
thoughts??
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Thank you
Withdrawn
Wife and I are debating. If the bottom is red the checkmark likely shouldn't be red.. Maybe another colour is my thought (wife mentioned gold after some discussion), ditch the checkmark is hers. My concern with that is boxy letters surrounded by a maple leaf. The checkmark adds volume/texture in my opinion.
Any thoughts??
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Thank you for feedback, i will try do my best, please check this revisions #26 #28 #29 #30. please let me know if you have any changes.
Hibban
Withdrawn
Appreciate your patience with us!!
Withdrawn
The red & blue doesn't provide the reaction we're looking for. Not sure about the S. Is there another way to present it? We feel it looks a bit like a snake
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Thank you for considering my work, please check some revisions.
Regards,
Hibban
Withdrawn
Like the S and M and like the idea of something outside the box. Only thing it's missing is the Canadian. Maybe an orange maple leaf instead of the leaves?
Withdrawn