Signature Ministry ResourcesLogo Design Contest

hi, my first entry

(This comment references Entry #73)

Thanks coolred.

Here's some things to try:

- We're trying to stay away from Christian symbols because we'll also be serving some non-Christian non-profits so we suggest removing the dove.
- Since the logo will go on a lot of reports, the background gradients will probably not be present so we'd like to see it on white.
- You've done a good job of making sure "Signature" is prominent, but try bolder colors

i'm glad i still have the time to revise :) thanks

(This comment references Entry #217)

color variation

(This comment references Entry #218)

Thanks coolred! We're glad you had time to revise as well.

#217 is nice - we'd recommend removing the quill. Could we see it without it?

#218 - we're not crazy about the color. We're trying to stay with blue or black (okay, we're probably pretty much leaning blue) as they are traditional pen colors when you sign your signature.

We're looking forward to seeing more!

thank you so much i appreciate your comment. will post my revision a.s.a.p.

hi, here is without the quill. thanks for waiting

(This comment references Entry #223)

Thanks coolred.

Thanks for making the changes - it helps us. We like what you did in #223 with the i-dot. At this point I don't think we have much more input for you on these entry styles and would love to see more from you.

Hi, thanks for your comment

(This comment references Entry #262)

Thanks.

On #262 the loopy "S" is hard to distinguish as an "S".

We have a lot of the "Signature" font in #263, but you kind of own the key cap, oversized "S". What if you used the "S" of #263 and the "ignature" of #262, and stair stepped the "Ministry Resources" and tagline like #223? Does that make sense?

Yes i think that would look great! Let me give it a try and post it shortly. Thanks!

Hi, here is my revised entry as per your request. Looks better and different :) Thanks so much for waiting!

(This comment references Entry #268)

Nice. One additional thought - what about adding in the gradient line from #262 under Ministry Resources?

Hi, here is with line :)

(This comment references Entry #271)