Thank you for all your help thus far! I would like to discuss the options you have provided with our team. We will get back to you on Monday or Tuesday next week. Have a great weekend!
Thanks for the reply and sorry for the confusion. Basically, we are looking for a "2nd" option before making our final decision. We do like this #391 version and it is definitely up for consideration. However, we would like to see something a bit different to have as a "2nd" option. Does this make sense?
Sorry. I don't understand the direction of your feedback here:
Nice work! We like it!
Can we bug you for one other option?
We would like to see a version with the points of the C's cut-off straight (meaning horizontal for the inner C and vertical for the outer C). HOWEVER...IMPORTANT...we want to keep the locations of where both C's currently end. This likely means the "thicker" portion of the C's will have to be stretched/extended to the current end points. I hope this makes sense! If you need clarification, please let us know.
I see a few more files uploaded but they all look very similar to this one. Did you get our message about requesting a different version with the C's cut-off?
We would like to see a version with the points of the C's cut-off straight (meaning horizontal for the inner C and vertical for the outer C). HOWEVER...IMPORTANT...we want to keep the locations of where both C's currently end. This likely means the "thicker" portion of the C's will have to be stretched/extended to the current end points. I hope this makes sense! If you need clarification please let us know.
Hi Anna. Thanks for the quick reply!
I think we are losing something in translation. Now the white space is small again. Let me try again..
1) we like the shapes of the C's in #168. Please keep this ratio/shape.
2) we like the thicker white space/gap between the two C's in #387.
Can these two ideas be combined?
Hello, :)
Yes! Right. The length and space for the two C's are quite different, between #168 and #387.
I just uploaded a new design in entry #388.
Let me know, if there are any adjustments/latest information. Thank you!
Hello Anna,
Thanks for your help so far with this logo. Further to yesterday's discussion, we are getting closer! However, when comparing this to your #168 submission, the C shapes do not wrap as far in #387. Can you please extend the points of both C shapes to where they were in submission #168?
Hi, Thanks for checking out some of the latest revised designs I uploaded.
Sure! I'll be waiting for updates, for some further adjustments you'd like to see. I love doing it.
Thank you!
Thank you Anna! I think we are getting closer. Our office is now closing for the day, but one of us will be in touch tomorrow with some more tweaks we would like to see with this design.
Hi Olson Curling,
Thank you for the ranking, and also for the feedback you have provided.
Please check! I've uploaded a new revised design. Are there any revisions / other things I need to do next? Thank you!
Thank you!
Great, we are getting closer with this one! One adjustment here though is we are hoping that the length of the strokes would stay the same and these seem to be shortened. We still want them to overlap the same amount as they did in the original logo. Hope that makes sense.
Hi Anna, we are really liking this logo. There are a couple tweaks we would like to see however. Can you make the white gaps between the strokes thicker? Like at least double the thickness they are now. Secondly, can the pointed edges of each stroke be softer/less sharp of a point? Thank you!
Appreciate the new designs! I think we are getting closer. We need something that is going to complement our existing logo but also stands out on its own.
Hi Anna, thanks for your logo! We are still looking for more ideas if you have anything else in mind? We can't really pin point what exactly we are looking for, we just know we would like to see more. Perhaps a symbol in the same style font that the word Olson is used (without using the word or a curling rock).
Hi, Thank you for the rating you give.
Do you have any feedback? Maybe you want to see color revisions, font variations, layouts, or something else. Thank you!
Comment Activity
would be very happy to hear further news from you,
don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.
anna
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Wait a minute. I will upload a new design soon. Thanks
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Thanks for the reply and sorry for the confusion. Basically, we are looking for a "2nd" option before making our final decision. We do like this #391 version and it is definitely up for consideration. However, we would like to see something a bit different to have as a "2nd" option. Does this make sense?
Withdrawn
Nice work! We like it!
Can we bug you for one other option?
We would like to see a version with the points of the C's cut-off straight (meaning horizontal for the inner C and vertical for the outer C). HOWEVER...IMPORTANT...we want to keep the locations of where both C's currently end. This likely means the "thicker" portion of the C's will have to be stretched/extended to the current end points. I hope this makes sense! If you need clarification, please let us know.
Can you explain it again?
Thank you
Anna
Withdrawn
I see a few more files uploaded but they all look very similar to this one. Did you get our message about requesting a different version with the C's cut-off?
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Please check! I've uploaded a new revised design. Is there anything else I can do next? Thank you!
Anna
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Can we bug you for one other option?
We would like to see a version with the points of the C's cut-off straight (meaning horizontal for the inner C and vertical for the outer C). HOWEVER...IMPORTANT...we want to keep the locations of where both C's currently end. This likely means the "thicker" portion of the C's will have to be stretched/extended to the current end points. I hope this makes sense! If you need clarification please let us know.
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
I think we are losing something in translation. Now the white space is small again. Let me try again..
1) we like the shapes of the C's in #168. Please keep this ratio/shape.
2) we like the thicker white space/gap between the two C's in #387.
Can these two ideas be combined?
Withdrawn
Yes! Right. The length and space for the two C's are quite different, between #168 and #387.
I just uploaded a new design in entry #388.
Let me know, if there are any adjustments/latest information. Thank you!
Anna
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Thanks for your help so far with this logo. Further to yesterday's discussion, we are getting closer! However, when comparing this to your #168 submission, the C shapes do not wrap as far in #387. Can you please extend the points of both C shapes to where they were in submission #168?
Withdrawn
Sure! I'll be waiting for updates, for some further adjustments you'd like to see. I love doing it.
Thank you!
Anna
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Thank you for the ranking, and also for the feedback you have provided.
Please check! I've uploaded a new revised design. Are there any revisions / other things I need to do next? Thank you!
Thank you!
Anna
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Do you have any feedback? Maybe you want to see color revisions, font variations, layouts, or something else. Thank you!
Anna