O'Hare & CompanyLogo Design Contest

I quite like 116. The grey parts of the icon almost look like the body on an abstract person. I wonder if you could try using that and making a 'head' with a smaller o? Also, I'd prefer the icon to the side rather than above. I like how you have the talent matters cradled like that. Not sure on the brown color.
Thanks for your ideas!!

Hi, thank you for your feedback. I've made the change you asked for, and I've tried a new color. Hope you like it!

(This comment references Entry #129)

Here is a new version of the logo with the changes you requested.

(This comment references Entry #170)

These are just some variations on the brush used in the icon.

(This comment references Entry #171)

I'm not sure if you can really tell the difference in the brushes at this size, but I thought I'd offer up the variations just in case.

(This comment references Entry #172)

I think you can really see the difference in the brush on this one.

(This comment references Entry #173)

Love the #170 version - can you try a few more typeface options? I like the typeface in 160 and 135. Can you try it both stacked and also in a single line. Also can you show me an option where the talent matters is not in the icon but under the O'Hare part?? Thank You!!

Also, can you keep it to a plain white background?

Thanks!

Here is a new version with a thinner typeface, and the slogan separated from the icon.

(This comment references Entry #175)

Here is a version with the same typeface as #175, but with the slogan cradled in the icon.

(This comment references Entry #176)

Same as #175, but "company" is in ALL CAPS.

(This comment references Entry #177)

Different typeface, but same set-up as #175.

(This comment references Entry #178)

Same as #178, slogan cradled in icon.

(This comment references Entry #179)

Company name all on one line.

(This comment references Entry #180)

Same as #180, but I tried something different with the tagline, carrying over the brush stroke. I tried reversing it out so the brush stroke was gray or green and the text was white, but it made it look too heavy next to such a thin typeface.

(This comment references Entry #181)

Could you try #181 with the tagline a little bigger and try it in caps also? Thank you!!

Can you show me #181 with the tagline spread out more under the O'Hare & Company and also show me what this looks like with the tagline back in the icon (keeping O'Hare & Company in one line)
Thank You!!

Sorry - also can you switch the colors so that O'Hare is in the darker color? Thanks!

Hi! Here are the variations you requested. First, the tagline bigger all lowercase.

(This comment references Entry #219)

tagline in all caps.

(This comment references Entry #220)

lowercase and spread out a bit, but still larger.

(This comment references Entry #221)

Here's one with the tagline in all caps without the brush stroke, and the lettering is spread out more.

(This comment references Entry #222)

And here's all one line with the tagline cradled. Thanks!

(This comment references Entry #223)

Thank you!! One more thing - can you change the & sign. We aren't keen on that version of &. Maybe something more like the one that's currently in 2nd place...I forget the # on it now and I can't see it.

Sure, but I'm afraid to flood you with 5 or 6 more variations. Do you have a new favorite for me to do this with?

#222 is the current new favorite! Just a couple of variations will be enough for now. Thanks!

Here come a couple of standard serif font ampersand options and a couple of other options - a little different for the sake of comparison.

(This comment references Entry #224)

Can you show me the #225 with the & in the same color as Company? Also, can you stretch the top of the "c" that makes that right side of the 'man' a little further? I had the comment that it makes it look like an "i" right now with the o for the head on top, so I'm trying to keep clear of that.
Can you also stretch talent matters so it fits all the way to the P of company? Also, I think I prefer it a little smaller like in 178. If you can give me a second version just as above where the smaller talent matters is cradled in the 'man' too that would be great.
Thank you, Thank you!!

Hi! I think this entry covers all but the last request to have a new version with "talent matters" cradled. The ampersand is the same color as "company," "talent matters" is smaller, but it's spread out all the way to the "P," and I've altered the logo so it looks less like an "i". One more version coming right up!

(This comment references Entry #243)

Can you play around with the #252 a little more - maybe more free form. I'm looking at it thinking a little too IT or Telecom looking, but I like the concept.

maybe switch up the sizes of the o's a little too - nothing too big but just to make something less uniform (I don't like the keypad effect right now). Ideally I'd like the one that stands out to be at the top.

Also, I don't mind a couple of circles overlapping - not all of them though. Thanks!

Hi, I received your comments. What do you think of this?

(This comment references Entry #332)

I like that it is more relaxed - but too many o's...can you cut down on the amount somehow? Maybe a more abstract grouping rather than in a heap. Can you try adding an orange in the color scheme somehow too?

Here are a few more options.

(This comment references Entry #334)

Can you give me another option on the grouping of the o's? I guess I am down to the last couple of hours to make a decision here!!

Here are some more options!

(This comment references Entry #354)

Here's a thinner version of my original submission. Just in case.

(This comment references Entry #356)

Can you do something with either just three or five of the o's? Any sizes?

Can you try 355 as a smaller square (less of the smaller o's?) and not on the diagonal but straight on?

Also can you try a single brushstroke o too?

Try a smaller circle on 354? - less o's in it. Thanks!

Here are more variations!

(This comment references Entry #385)

Can you try a thinner brushstroke for the 386?

Thinner stroke as requested! It's down to the wire!

(This comment references Entry #409)