Natalie Dreml - Stage. List. Sold!Logo Design Contest

Hi Natalie,

here I am back with 2 different concepts.

#93 concept is kindda Shabby Chic style. I designed a custom pattern you can even use alone for backgrounds.

#94 concept is more refined, almost realistic, almost a piece of art.

Thanks for inviting!,

Nat

Hi agan Nat,

here I am back with new concepts based on your message. I also re-worked the flower into a simple & clean version (no gradients, no effects) for press. Also tried a few versions with the flower to the left (I like it!), but it makes the name get smaller (if using the same area of a vertical landscape).

What do you think? I will be around for a while.

Later!,
Nat

I like the color of 148.. It is very classy:)

Can we see it with the buildings.. name.. slogan? We would also like to see the reverse color of white background and that exact same shade of brown as the outline design.. Good job Nat!!

Nat,

#152 (one color using PANTONE). The "dark mink" color I used before cannot be reproduced in Pantone colors, so I used the closest Pantone from the color book (my color book is ut of date, we can check the new books for a closer "mink")

#153 White ink on mink.

#154 and #155 are the horizontal versions in plain.

Nat

Nat,

new version #158 with diamond. What do you think?

Nat

#187

What about decreasing the flower size to have it on a same visual level with the buildings?

Nat

YES we have houses:) My name seems a little far off from the logo i think.. The flower seems like it is an awkward positioning.. I am not sure... Maybe if it is more centered or perhaps the houses/buildings are the shade of the flower and vice versa the flower the lighter shade?

Update: #188

Nat

Hmmm.. I am not fond of this version.. the flower just looks off now..

ohh I don't know .. maybe make the flower white like in number 154

with version number 139 it looked like the flower was floating and so it looked like it belonged in the logo... and now it kind of looks off-sided... hmmm.. I am not a creative genius unfortunately...

To have it white we need a dark background. But you cannot choose a logo based on one version only. There should be a logo and "versions" of the logo as you need. Between those versions, one could be the one with the white flower on dark background. But first you need to choose the MAIN version of the logo (not the negative of the logo).

Nat

as I mentioned i just find the flower is in an awkward position at the moment.. what would you suggest?

Also I suggest less buildings and houses.. make it more simple - fewer of all and similar to first version 139.

Position is almost the same position it used to have, it's only smaller and with the houses it got too busy and I had to remove the reflection of the buildings (#189).

Nat

I prefer the buildings to be the same color you had them in 188 with stronger emphasis on housing...

something like #190 and #191 maybe?

Nat

#192, #193 and #194

Nat

We have gone from too much details to no details on the buildings?? The right side of the building looks like something took a bite out of it... why? Can I see it using a diff shade of green perhaps a fluorescent?

#195

195 definitely does not work... and the flower looks out of place

193 is interesting but prefer to see building more like 190 - 191 but less details

#196 ?

Nat