Monarch Resource PartnersLogo Design Contest

Fantastic! Thank you! We aren’t sure how this works exactly, but we wanted to make sure we could contact you to say thanks, etc.

Hi, This is vector graphic since the beginning so this is infinitely scalable. I'm posting here magnified middle section.

Can you please just remove all the pixelation and make as clean as possible so that when we blow this up into a sign there are no pixels?

This is the one I believe we are going with

Here you are. Actually I wasn't aware of this separation. I didn't clean the other logo and it was kind of leftover.

The logo in 1st is what we like but in the logo that is in 2nd place the line separating the “monarch” and “resource partners” has a space in it. And we kind of like that. So we’d like to have the line the same as that on the logo in 1st place

Sure I did misunderstand you. But I'm still not sure what do you mean by "split on the line". Do you want to see two lines one under another or split the line in half vertically? Could you just rephrase it or draw it on the entry? (There is a feature which enables contest holder to draw over the entries).

I think you misunderstood me. I meant to put the split on the line separating Monarch and Resource Partners. The wing can go back to the cleaned up version.

#308 #309 - I'm not sure if I understood your last request but I put back split in the wings like it was before

Can you put the split back on the separation line. Submit one with the blue line and one with a grey line.

Here I farther increased spacing and reduced number of elements in the wings by joining adjacent pair.

I increased spacing between elements of the wings.

We really like this version. The only thing we are concerned about is if there is enough spacing in the butterfly for caps and shirts, etc. Not sure if there is a way to clean it up or not so that the spacing will suffice for stitching?

Also, can you create a few with the line colored red or also grey? We like the line, but just want to exhaust all options at this point.

From #300 to #303 - I'm posting versions with complete name in the same order.

Can your put this one back in the main logo as well to see how it would work with all of the letters?

I like these options with the red elements to help the “m” and “a” can you put each of these back in the entire logo with the rest of the letters so we can see how it looks?

I understand. Just want to look at some different options.

From #296 to #299 I'm posting entries with "M" gradually more pronounced.

But when I make it more similar to "M" it will not work as "A". It has to be something ambiguous enough to let it be interpreted both ways. I have one more idea of adding red elements inside "A' to build "M". I will try it and post results.

Great. We are still looking for a few different options to work with the bottom of the logo to look a little more like a “M”

Here you are.

Can you provide an image of the logo only?

From #286 to #289 - versions with stretched tagline. This one and #289 have identical font size to #276.

This is getting pretty close...we’ve also been talking about stretching the font on the “resource partners” to be the length of monarch

From #276 to #278 I'm posting three attempts. This one has "M" curved most and also involves reshaping of the butterfly body.

Can you make the “A” a little more curved? And try to structure it to where it resembles an “m” when the logo is by itself?

I'm posting two versions with improved curves and spacing between them. I think they do look better than previous entries. #199 has spacing a bit smaller than this one.

Getting close here, I think if we can figure out how to smooth it out to where it’s curved like the rest of the butterfly that might help.

From #169 to #173 there are different approaches to "M" in the tails. You will probably need additional version of the text when icon gets separated as there will be a gap without butterfly.

We like this a lot, but can we look at a few options. Can we look at adjusting the blockiness of the “A” so that when the logo is removed it looks like an “m” for monarch but when it is in the actual word it still represents the A?

From #145 to #150 I tested some fonts. Please let me know which one is closest.

That’s what I was looking for. Now maybe make the “resource partners” less bold and maybe stretched a little?

Yes. If you can except "N" partially covered it farther improves symmetry.

Can you keep this logo how it is, but make the left side of the butterfly identical to the right side on the bottom?

I'm uploading two versions with blue elements in the wings. While adding blue to the wings we have to be careful not to make icon similar to British colors.

I like this, but separate the “n” similar to how the “r” is. That way the standalone logo will have some blue in the wings as well

#93 and #94 - two versions with monarch disconnected from the "N" and "R". Please note that from the beginning butterfly is shaped to symbolize natural resources coming from underground.

No I think take it back down into the wording, but disconnect it from the “N”

It's perfectly symmetrical I believe. Symmetry was on my mind when designing this logo.

I like it but I’d like to have the logo to be symmetrical if it were to stand alone without the wording. For branding pusposes