this is interesting...i still have that redundancy problem with 3D
it is in the image and the text. maybe more abstract. the 3D here is at the wrong angle and doesn't seem to fit on the building.
not bad, i feel like the 3D in the cube is obvious and thus it looks redundant.
wonder if it needs to be more abstract?
OR maybe the two don't go together...
this isn't bad...
try the M on top?
any way you can incorporate the buildings in the previous into this cube?
almost as if the buildings were the cube but with the text overlay? curious how that would look.
Comment Activity
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
it is in the image and the text. maybe more abstract. the 3D here is at the wrong angle and doesn't seem to fit on the building.
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
almost like it shouldnt be paired with the words
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Can you make the M3D less abstract, more obvious? :)
opposite of the other one which is not abstract enough.
Withdrawn
wonder if it needs to be more abstract?
OR maybe the two don't go together...
Withdrawn
try the M on top?
any way you can incorporate the buildings in the previous into this cube?
almost as if the buildings were the cube but with the text overlay? curious how that would look.
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
thanks
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
can the cube look like a building also?
Withdrawn
regards,
ndrau
Withdrawn
again, no slogan please
building is too commercial, we serve both commercial and residential along with other spaces
Withdrawn
thanks
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Not convinced i want the slogan in the logo (it might change)