and diana and i really liked seeing the b&w also, we're kinda small potatoes and sometimes that will be the way our logo will need to be used.
we like the simple color scheme of #147 better ... you can almost see this as a really cool t-shirt already. [smile]
we like your strong typography and the way you anchor in a clever graphic. our favorite designs of yours were yes! labels, inwindow outdoor, scottworld, and get robo.
we're a mouthful here with "managing the waterway" and "cruising guides and electronic charting" so your tight typography and a central, relevant and intuitive GREAT graphic will be much appreciated.
we're looking forward to seeing more of your concepts and variations.
please let us know anything we can do to help you and thank you for all of your hard work.
I really don't know how this "ranking" and "not interested" metaphor is supposed to work.
But, unfortunately, I think it may mislead someone (and that someone could be you or me) into believing a concept is still alive if it's really not. That and Diana and I are trying not to hurt anyone's feelings. So we're probably leaving too much in the "ranked" column.
Remember, this is all new to us so please forgive our blundering.
Here's what I'd like to do and how you should interpret the next round of sorting:
1. If it's ranked, it's still alive and I assume you are working and improving that design along the lines of what we've either publicly or privately commented. I also assume you are generating new concepts because, so far, NO ONE IS WINNING. We are not satisfied with even the leaders (high rankings) ... otherwise we would have ended the contest earlier versus extending it. Make sense?
2. Otherwise, it's in the "not interested" column. Earlier, crcdesigns explained to me how to re-order everything at the end of the contest so as many people as possible get credits, and the leading designs all get ranked in the appropriate order (see above post). Never fear, I will absolutely do that at the END of the contest.
3. But for now anyway, the ranked entries are too clogged and they also aren't putting enough fire into either of us. Me, to drill down and focus on designs that could win the contest, and you to abandon concepts that shouldn't really be ranked and not competitive ... when bringing forth a new concept would serve you better.
So please do not be insulted when some concepts go quickly into the not interested column. Let's both communicate and focus on the potential winners!
And by the way, thanks once again everyone for all of the hard work and patience you're demonstrating,