Hi in this logo M reps the 1st letter of your name it has to boats and waves in the M reps. the cruising part of your company and in the middle of the M theres a compass sign with GPS pings coming out of it these reps the electronic charting part of your company. Let me know what you think is it to much or let me know if you want a simpler looks thanks david.
Yeah, I think you're right ... the M is a bit too much. You might be able to play with MTW and pull out something.
We also like your dots ideas and the This Church idea. Don't expect that this is directly "mappable" to us but I wanted to give you as much feedback as possible to help.
hi heres some MTW looks theres waves to show you manage the waters and a GPS beam to your electronic charting side of business pls. give feed back ..dave
hi heres some MTW looks theres waves to show you manage the waters and a GPS beam to your electronic charting side of business pls. give feed back ..dave
hi heres some MTW looks theres waves to show you manage the waters and a GPS beam to your electronic charting side of business pls. give feed back ..dave
I really don't know how this "ranking" and "not interested" metaphor is supposed to work.
But, unfortunately, I think it may mislead someone (and that someone could be you or me) into believing a concept is still alive if it's really not. That and Diana and I are trying not to hurt anyone's feelings. So we're probably leaving too much in the "ranked" column.
Remember, this is all new to us so please forgive our blundering.
Here's what I'd like to do and how you should interpret the next round of sorting:
1. If it's ranked, it's still alive and I assume you are working and improving that design along the lines of what we've either publicly or privately commented. I also assume you are generating new concepts because, so far, NO ONE IS WINNING. We are not satisfied with even the leaders (high rankings) ... otherwise we would have ended the contest earlier versus extending it. Make sense?
2. Otherwise, it's in the "not interested" column. Earlier, crcdesigns explained to me how to re-order everything at the end of the contest so as many people as possible get credits, and the leading designs all get ranked in the appropriate order (see above post). Never fear, I will absolutely do that at the END of the contest.
3. But for now anyway, the ranked entries are too clogged and they also aren't putting enough fire into either of us. Me, to drill down and focus on designs that could win the contest, and you to abandon concepts that shouldn't really be ranked and not competitive ... when bringing forth a new concept would serve you better.
So please do not be insulted when some concepts go quickly into the not interested column. Let's both communicate and focus on the potential winners!
And by the way, thanks once again everyone for all of the hard work and patience you're demonstrating,