Thanks for your submission! We like your work and would like to see more. As for 55, overall we like it but we are not sold on having a person-type object within the logo unless it is more abstract or a really unique incorporation. Also, please do not limit yourself to green and blue as we are not. Thanks again, we look forward to more from you!
We like where 65 is going. It looks like it is moving backwards though, too upright, so if you could have the person moving more forward as if running/reaching forward. Then the person's figure could give the impression of the letters I h s. The leaves are nice, but our sister company's logo is too similar to that, thanks. Please continue with 65, good potential there
Thanks! We like the line in front of Freedom to Move as a variation. As for the figure, I think I was not clear. I meant to slant the person/letters forward more and almost leaning in towards to "I" of intrinsic. You might even want to try rotating the sphere 10-15 degrees to the right. Does that make sense? Thanks for your quick reply!!
Can you take some of the curve at the butt away. It looks more like a female and we need it to be more asexual. Getting there with the slant....could you try slanting a little more? Thanks for the quick response!
Thank you! I am trying to see if there is anything that can be altered to 125 or 152 to make it feel slightly more abstract or intriguing. Like maybe a more abstract globe/circle? Brush strokes? A galaxy or saturn looking thing? Thoughts?
We like #155. Thanks. Could we see a a couple slight variations? 1) in a single color please? 2) With the font under the figure? and maybe the foot in contact with the word Intrinsic?? Use your creative judgement. 3) Is it possible to give a SLIGHT illusion of the figure coming through the ring/circle? Maybe put one foot as if on other side of ring/circle or something?
Also could we see the font from 163 with the logo from 55? Perhaps an option of the font under the logo on this one as well?
Thanks for the great creative logos! I appreciate your work on these!
Thank you for the adjustments! I think it still holds weight in the single color which is important. Great news. I probably wasn't clear but I also wanted to keep one 155 in tack but with just a different (New Times Roman type) font like in 178 Sorry for confusion