Like a lot about this, but don't love it. Hard to say exactly why. I still like the font and I am intrigued by your unique approach by placing the graphic behind the text rather than a separate pictorial graphic (not sure if I am using the correct terminology). I also like the fact that you didn't use the same blue and green combination like everyone else. While I like the blue/green combos, I have been hoping for some other ideas. Don't think I like the gray in the graphic. I guess it is supposed to tie the two together, but it looks a bit dull to me. Maybe it is the combination of bright blues with gray. Also, I think the thinness of the font makes it difficult to reach with the graphic in the background.
As I have posted in my general comments, I would like to see someone attempt a wordmark logo too.
Thank you for your new submissions. I don't think any of them will work for us, however. Still like the font in #74, but the leaf graphic does not relate well to our business. I don't really care for the other new submissions since I was the word "interact" to stand alone. We are planning to spin off other entities, such as Interact Consulting or Interact Services, so we want to be able to create almost a stand-alone logo with the word "Solutions" or "Consulting" or "Services" below it.