Thanks a lot for your suggestions. #2 and #3 are great starts. We like the start very much. We have some suggestions for change. Maybe the pions should be more abstract, i.e. remove shadow and graph. Right now they are very playful, but more abstract would be nice. My colleague suggests that you could make a couple of large pions on the back and a smaller one in front where the front design would be contrasted with another blue color. The text in #2 and #3 looks better than in #5. But we would like more equal treatment between 'Entrepreneurship' and 'Organizational Behavior'. Maybe with different shades of blue like in #5, but more like the font style of 'Entrepreneurship' in #2 and #3.
Thanks for the quick response to our reactions. It really gets better. Some new reactions. The line in #9 looks great. We also like the weight and color of the text in #9. We are not sure about the position of "&". Maybe this can be positioned differently or somehow in the background, but bigger. Not sure how this can be done, but maybe you have some ideas. The "p" in line one should be more away from the "l" in line two. They are connected. We would like to see the text being slightly farther from the line.
The pions have a very classic style, maybe it would be an idea to see some other style in the pion shape. The ring in #6 is not bad. Maybe there should be a fourth pion. And/or a more asymmetric positioning, where the small one is more to the right.
We disagree about the ties within the group. Maybe we could see some with and without.
Thanks for the new suggestions. We discussed the logos this morning. We are concerned about the pions possibly making the impression that they are pawns or peasants, i.e. low-ranked. This is somehow stigmatized in Denmark. Could there be other shapes that still emphasizes strategy?
The "&" is not working for us. Maybe it can be spelled out as 'and'.