#38: We like this one best so far. The font is good, the swoosh is now in a good position. Would prefer bolder colors, even if that means departing from our palette a little. We dot like the way the dark red we chose shows up in these logos online, so please don't use that red. Would like to see some contrast between the logo word and the swoosh, as you had in design #1 earlier. Nice work.
#13: We like the font, and the "ec" is far enough away from the word so as to not be confusing or distracting. Would prefer to see bolder colors, especially in the word. If there's way to keep the "ec" intact while calling more attention to the word eCoverage (stronger colors or larger font than "ec" mark) that would be ideal. As is this one looks a little "washed out". We like it a lot though as a concept.
#20: We'd like to get away from using this dark red, as we've decided it looks brown when seen on screen. Is there a way to use the oval concept, but make it more in the background, more subtle? It's too literal right now.
#42: Definitely has potential, but looks washed out and doesn't have contrast. Would like to see more colors, stronger colors used. Stronger blues, green and black, perhaps?
#36: Like the font, like the swoosh (although it could be lowered) but we don't want to use plain, fire engine red in the logo.