Digital WagsLogo Design Contest Logo Design Contest Contests / Digital Wags Digital Wags has selected their winning logo design. For $275 they received 81 designs from 13 different designers from around the world. Find out how LogoTournament works How LogoTournament works Contest Annotation Delete We are sorry, but the time to edit this annotation has expired. Save Cancel Entries by biaggong Return to Contest Return to Contest Comment Activity Order by Ranking Entry Number Comment Activity To leave a comment please click on the logo. 1st 6 2nd 1 3rd 7 4th 5th 1 6th New New New New New New New New New Withdrawn New Prefers others. Prefers others. Prefers others. 1 Prefers others. 2 Comment Activity DigitalWags commented on #79 No need to apologize. Thank you so much! Getting close to launch. 4 years ago biaggong commented on #79 Hello, terribly sorry for late response. Been away from computer for few days. It's Gotham Book Regular with small modification on the 'A'. Thank you 4 years ago DigitalWags commented on #79 Hasto, can you share the font names you used? I need to get business cards made and would like to use that font or similar. Thank you! 4 years ago biaggong commented on #79 Thank you for the award, offer and kind words. Please find final files and let me know if you need anything else. Thank you. Regards Hasto 4 years ago DigitalWags commented on #79 I cannot thank you enough for this beautiful, elegant design. You are very talented and I’d like to use you in my business as a freelancer on a per project basis if you are interested. If so, please email me at paula.burr@gmail.com. Can you give me separate images for the logo as well? One with the brand ID and the other with the full business name. Thank you again for an creative brain power. I am in awe... 4 years ago biaggong commented on #79 Please notice D as part of the tails 4 years ago DigitalWags commented on #71 Hi again! Thank you so much. Can you remove the gray pixels on the i please? We Don’t think it’s necessary with this new font. Also, if you look at some of the others, they turned the D and W into a brand mark above the logo. Can you try the same type of thing? Look at 5, 11, 13, 14, 16. See what you can come up with and we can close this out! 4 years ago DigitalWags commented on #48 Let me clarify, we would like to see your recommendation on a brandmark that can be used in social media - an icon if you will. We would also like this logo to incorporate the font face on #50. 4 years ago biaggong commented on #48 Hello. IMO I prefer the W. More stand out and easier to differentiate from the others. Thank you 4 years ago DigitalWags commented on #48 Also, really like the font face on the literal on #50. Can you incorporate? 4 years ago DigitalWags commented on #48 With design elements on the dot on the i and the W, I'm having a hard time envisioning what could be used as the brand mark, which will be necessary for social use. Can you recommend a brand mark please? 4 years ago DigitalWags commented on #48 The people voting still prefer the red version, but thank you so much for trying the shades of blue. 4 years ago biaggong commented on #63 Thanks again for feedback 4 years ago DigitalWags commented on #48 One more request for comparison. Can you change the red to a shade of blue or teal that works please. ? 4 years ago DigitalWags commented on #48 I really, really like this. It gives a nod to both words and keeps one word from being more important than the other. Thank you! You are the one to beat at this point. 4 years ago biaggong commented on #49 Thank you for feedback. And sorry for late response. 4 years ago DigitalWags commented on #36 Is it possible to treat the D in digital to make it look digital in some fashion? We want to make sure that both words have equal importance. It may be too much. What are your thoughts? 4 years ago DigitalWags commented on #36 This is very interesting. I would put this near the top. But if I do, there will be an onslaught of wagging tails. Just know I really, really like this. Can you try this in another color as well? 4 years ago