Credit Score DefenderLogo Design Contest

Thank you for the great submissions! We really like #32, but feel that the colors are a little muted.

Could you create alternatives with some different color options? Or something birghter and more attention-grabbing?

We look forward to seeing more from you!

Thanks for the feedback and the great ranking!
Sure, coming up color's variations!
Regards
Alexander

Thanks, Alexander! We definitely like the new colors. Could you please try it with a few modifications:

- The keyhole underneath the shield, as in #34.
- The font the same as in #32 (even if that means the shield has to decrease in size).
- An alternate version with the above changes, but without the numbers in the shield background.

We really appreciate your great work!

OK! Right away....

New variations....

(This comment references Entry #43)

Thanks so much - we are going to review now!

Thank you and I would like to tell you that if you need any variations just tell me and I'll be happy to make them.
Good luck.
Alexander

Hi Alexander,

Can you please revise #32 as follows:

- Remove the keyhole completely
- Remove the numbers in the background of the shield
- Brighten up the green and blue - we like that color scheme more than the red/blue

Thanks so much!

Can you also please add the website to the bottom of the logo:

www.CreditScoreDefender.com

Thanks!

Sure! Here it is!
Thanks
Alexander

(This comment references Entry #55)

Great, thank you!

I'm afraid, though, that the small green type might get lost. Would the website look better in black?

Another one variation...
Thanks

(This comment references Entry #59)

Thanks!!

I think that in grey is better... but I will send a variation in black!

... in black!

(This comment references Entry #63)

Just wanted to add that if it's needed I can provide multiple variations of the design (other colors, numbers in the shield, etc.) and of course in any type file.
Thanks
Alexander

Great!

Can you please show #63, but with more of a navy blue?

..more navy...

(This comment references Entry #70)