I'm very intrigued by all three of your entires. Each has a great, unique design sense to them...
#75 - This has a VERY cool look to it, but there are two things about it I'd need adjusted: 1) I don' like how the design element (I'll call it the "logo") looks abruptly "clipped" at the right side. 2) The shading and gradients on the "logo" element looks terrific, but I'm partial to a more minimalistic, "flat" design that can more easily be reproduced in copies, black-and-white, etc. Would there be away to adjust this logo to incorporate the above two notes?
#76 - This is another very nice entry. Unlike #75, the "logo element" is not clipped, and does not employ gradients—it's flat. I like the font and I like how "contrary" and "content" run together. I'm not sure if "contrary" needs to be bold—I'd have to see it both ways. The one thing holding me back with this logo is it's almost "too" simple. Interlocking circles are used in many, many logos, and I'm not quite sure this logo images gets across the "contrary" or "controversial" element I'm looking for...
#77 - Another strong entry. I find this logo quite pleasing to look at. That said, I fear it's a bit too similar to the Comedy Central logo (something I'm seeing with a lot of entries) and, although it looks great, I think this entry is the least effective at evoking the "contrary" theme.
I would love to see adjustments and additional entries from you!
#119, #120, and #121 all look great with the shading removed—thanks for that. I'm still torn about how the graphics seem abruptly "clipped" at the edge. #121 fixes this by putting the logo on top, but then I kind of lose that they're supposed to represent "C's"... Not sure. I'd love to see alternate designs.
#186 - It's the best fit logo of all my entries for Contrary Content in my humble opinion. Double C looking at each other, representing "contrary" Hope you will love it!