Would it be possible for you to develop this logo a bit more? We feel it is a bit "thin". We would like to work more with the words Brands 4 Success in the logo. Keep the purity you have in your current suggestions but elaborate with the colors and use Brands 4 Succes.
Thank you very much for your new suggestions! Please see my comment above regarding developing the logo a bit more. If you have any questions to us, please do not hesitate to ask us!
Hi Luis, Another member (Alexander) from the B4S team giving some feedback. First let me start by saying that I'm truly impressed with what you have accomplished so far. I really like #17 as it is clean, "proportinous" and looks professional.
However, maybe it is somewhat thin? Imagine if it would be applied on a white company car moving on the highway? After doing some thinking back and forth I now think I know what I'm looking for. When I look at your #83 and #76 I think what you have done there is that you have added another dimension which is the (in lack of another word) a "geometric form" that actually makes them recognizable as a seperate graphical element, even if you can't read the text. To describe it in another way, if those logos would be placed on a wall far far away (or company car moving rapidly) you could still recognize the form and then associate to B4S even when the letters and the text cannot be recognized. So the questions is if those thoughts could be applied to #17 by making it "thicker" and/or by maybe adding/changing some graphical elements (or colors)? To give you an example of what I mean you could look at a company called Brandspot "www.brandspot.com" who's logo also works as a separate graphical element on it's own. As you understand the Team really likes your #17 as it also captures B4S and "brands for success" in the same logo and so far the team are promoting your work internally :-)
Thanks for you great effort so far! Best regards B4S Team
We really like these two logos!!! On #122 you have a line between Brands For Success and B4S. Could you please add that to #121 aswell? Also we would very much like to see #121 and #122 in a green color on 4 and For, would that be possible to arrange? Could you also please add "the top" on hte ¤ that you have on #124?
Close the 4 is what I mean but I understand what you mean with closing it and I agree that it wouldnt be as good looking with a closed top. Could you please just elaborate a bit with the 4 though so the size difference beteen the B, S and the 4 is so big. As it is now it goes down a bit too much we feel and we do not want that big "dip".
You are very creative and we really appreciate all the work you are doing!!!
Alex, here again. Wow, alot of great logos from you!
Would it be possible to on #122 change place on B4S and Brands For Success (like the number #121 but with a line between) and copy the greenish color from #145? As it is the team have decide to work with either your blue color or a more "greenish" one as in the #145. However, you have made a very good example in #119 where you show how the blue color would work with a complement color, and that sure looks nice! What would the complement color to dark green be you think?
Ahh, now it looks almost perfect I must say. On #175 you have however changed the size of the 4. I'm not sure if it was better compared to #122 as I think the smaller 4 actually broke the symmetry in a good way. Do you have time for another update? The team will have a small conference tomorrow morning (9 o'clock swedish time) where it will be a final voting.
Thanks to you. In this type of competition, at times, is difficult to fit a minimalist style.
Realise a question. Any small change of form or color becomes part of the contract. I mean even awarded the prize. You can even send in different colors and/or funds.
Also after ending the contest, no. 1, may continue sending modifications, before the final decision
OK, thanks for your input. Not sure I fully understand and I didn't realise that we could continue the dialogue after the contest. Still, the only thing to alter would be to go back to the original form of the "4" as you have used in almost all your iterations. But as you say maybe we can take that later?