I felt the circle around logo in #12 and #13 is well representing our product's performance(speed) and lightness for a 3D graphics rendering engine. But the 'M' in #9 and #10 may cause misreading('IVI'?), I think.
Thank you for your trying. However, I regret to say new logos are worse than before in balance, I felt. If you don't mind, please tune the balance of new logos, or add a little more dynamism to previous logos.
#187, #196 - #198 New concept of the icon is not bad. However, in balance, these are not better than others. It may be good if the icon united with characters.
#192 - #195, #201 I like #201. However, I like shapes of 'M' of #194, #195, and #174 at the same time. How will it looks like if #201 have 'M' like #194, #195, and #174.
I like #211 and #212 most in your logos. However, if the 'M' in these logos is just a little more taller, these logos may become more better, I think. So, please try to make the 'M' taller if you have time.
And now, I want to see a white, mono-color and flat version with black background to decide the winner.