#9 is interesting, but I don't think people will get it. Simple is better for this logo, as it is targeting a wide audience... think the gmail audience.
#9 is interesting, but I don't think people will get it. Simple is better for this logo, as it is targeting a wide audience... think the gmail audience.
The camera in @2 is a lighter gray than the text "slide". I wanted to keep them consistent.
The contest is pretty early, let's just let #9 sit for a bit. I might be able to make it simpler
Really like #69, wife and I like the orange better than the blue because the blue took both of our eyes the wrong direction. The orange in the middle leads the eye from left to right towards the "anyslide". Thanks!!!
Re: #69, can you do a version where the camera does not have a white border, and one where the white border is a just a touch bigger? Love the font and letter spacing! Thank you!
One thing you need to remember is that while the work here that you're buying is vector graphics (good thing), the images you see are uploaded as bitmaps (jpg, png, or gif) and the site compresses them a little bit to. So what you're seeing is a little different than the true source files you'll end up with after the contest is over.
But I can't explain why some of the entries in this contest are almost blurry, if not kind of fuzzy.
I wanted to make a couple changes to the logo part and upload with both versions of the text I've submitted here. I think I really have a clean, sharp and well ballanced mark here. I think the reason you sited that other sites logo in your brief was the fact that their mark was very crisp and bold, which is all about the type. So many of the desings here just look so fussy and washed out.