DealNShareLogo Design Contest

logo 1

(This comment references Entry #1)

If using an abstract mark, it must not be larger than the logo text. If this is not possible, please aim for a more web2.0 logo than an abstract mark logo.

Please do not use gray for any of the letters.

Please keep in mind that the logo will be sitting on a blue background, and you have placed a white background.

I believe the color blue should be a bit brighter. More like a sky-blue.

Thank you for the entry.

LOGO 2

(This comment references Entry #4)

LOGO 3

(This comment references Entry #5)

LOGO 4

(This comment references Entry #6)

The new ones are better. We screwed up by asking for a blue background.... kill that please.

Not fond of font in 4 and 5.

In # 6, it would be good to have symmetry with the abstract marks, like dots on both sides. My biz partner is very fond of the dots for some reason, whereas I like the arrows but would prefer for them to be thicker.

You can use white for the logo, not gray though. I really like something similar to skype's logo because of the color choice and one color behind the other.

logo 5
thanks for the feedback. i'll do the modification for no. 6 tomorrow. going to sleep now it's 2:30 a.m.

(This comment references Entry #7)

logo 5

(This comment references Entry #8)

logo 7

(This comment references Entry #9)

Why was entry # 7 withdrawn???

What happened with the previous version of entry #8? Was that #7 that was withdrawn?

Please post up both versions if you can.

logo 7
sorry about that...here it is again

(This comment references Entry #11)

For Entry 8 and 11, arrows are too big and should be less dominant like arrows in entry # 5.

For # 11, if arrows were more subtle and font was bold faced font with a drop-shadow similar to skype logo, then this might look good.

logo 8

(This comment references Entry #72)

logo 9

(This comment references Entry #73)