For entry #277 #275 and #278: We asked not to see any more marks that reuse the CG. Please be sure to read all of the feedback and notes we have provided.
Entry #271: This does not work for what our industry does as I'm not really sure what the tie to 3d architecture is to an eye.
Entry #274: The font and brackets around the cube don't work for me, but I do like the cube itself. Might be something you could do with that.
Entry #283 #282: I find this particular font hard to read with the way the T's are created. I also don't think the gears really have much to do with our industry.
Entry #288 #285: These entries is are a bit weak and really do not stand out to me. They are generic looking with no tie to our industy. The lens flare is something that is very cliche as well and would be very hard to reprodice in print and when the logo is screened on different backgrounds.
Entry #284: This is the same font we are using in our current logo, so we are looking for something new.
Thanks for the new entries. I really like the treatments of the cube for #301 and #322. The only thing I think is not working for me is the typeface. I would check out some of the higher ranking examples to see the style we are leaning towards.
The fonts used in entry #347 #349 and #350 are not what we are looking for. I prefer the earlier versions. the font from #339 #336 #346 are our current favorites.
The font for verison #351 #356 and #357 are too bold and heavy. We prefer the earlier lighter versions. also we don't want any reflections. The earlier cube is the better mark I think. #364 does not work as well.