CGarchitect.comLogo Design Contest

a few variations for your discretion...

Hi Lexlogo,

I used to work for a company in Lexington!

Some interesting new ideas here. Different than anything else so far.

Entry #245 and #246: I think adding a mouse is a bit too cliche, but some interesting shapes developing otherwise.

Entry #247 and #248: Like where you are going, but I think this one might be a bit too busy. Too much going on and the name loses focus. The name and mark feel a bit disconnected as well.

Entry #249: I like that this one is a simpler design and overall looks pretty interesting. Probably a bit too literal with the windows. I tend to prefer the more abstract marks that have subtle hints that tie back to our industry.

Entry #250: I think the happy medium would be somewhere between this one and #249.

Overall it's an interesting concept, but it's not quite to the point where I think it fits. With this type of concept I would like to see the mark tie back to the digital aspect industry without being as literal or cliche as something like a mouse. Otherwise it remains too generic in terms of any other business in the construction industry. The typeface is a bit too similar to our existing logo, which we want to freshen up to fit with our new site redesign.

Cheers,
Jeff

thanks Jeff.. I'll try and work them a little more... I wish I could do half the things they do in 3Ds Max and those programs.. however, i dont have the patience...

#256 > with particles/data blocks and wireframes

#253, #254, #255 different versions..

Hi,

Thanks for the new submissions. The new typeface is definitely on track now.

#255: I don't think the gradient treatment works for me here.
#253: Is too abstract now and hard to tell what it is

I'm not sure if the mark is headed down the right path. I think we're looking for something a bit more simple.

Cheers,
Jeff

thanks for the feedback none-the-less Jeff.

a little more simplistic and a "hidden" direct select arrow....

(This comment references Entry #261)

*a more defined direct select arrow and a change to the font*

(This comment references Entry #262)

Thanks. Of the two, I think #261 is the best version just because of the line in the name that I don't think works. I don't know if this concept is quite what we are after, but this is a solid logo. Nice work.

Cheers,
Jeff