Please see my comments on your first round of logos in the main discussion section of our competition. As there were two overall styles I commented on them in two groups.
These comments are in reference to your new concepts (Entry #22 to #33). The font is more contemporary looking which is good, but I don't think the overall look of this concept is really what we are after. Specifically the mark, which we would like to be more graphical and organic and nature. I would reccomend taking a look at the PDF link we have referenced in our contest brief. This should give you a good idea of the style we are after.
Also, to ensure you don't spend too much time on each concept, I would reccomend only submitting 1 or 2 examples from a particular concept. If it's something we think id workable, we can have you develop more iterations. We will only be ranking 1 logo from each concept.
Thanks and looking forward to seeing more concepts.
For entries #36 to #43 I'm affraid I'm not really in love with any of these concepts. None of them feel very well connected overall and I think there are too many things going on in these compositions. The fonts are all very basic and not distinctive enough. Fonts like Arial, Times New Roman or similar are not what we are after. Someone should be able to look at the font and recognize it as our brand.