Hi, I heard you were looking for some additional entries to your contest and thought I'd give it a go. It seems you're looking for something really simple. I'd like to warn you against choosing a wordmark design that is just made up of fonts without any kind of customization. At that rate, you're better off just getting the font, but you also may have some issues with copyrighting the logo. I'm not an expert, but I'd encourage you to look into that. A wordmark logo can be really impactful with just the slightest customizations. My first entry separates the letters with small dots, which is intended to be a very simple representation of alignment, which is a fact of wireframing and wireframing tools. Also, I've treated it with an inset text approach, which might be a nice way to display it on a simple website like the CAA site.
I noticed you included a link to gliffy. I've been trying out an online wireframe tool called Hotgloo that I absolutely love. It's in beta right now, so it's free to sign up. You should check it out.
Lindsey - I appreciate all of the comments and warnings. Very much appreciated. I have not used Hotgloo - I will definitely check it out.
I really like both of these submissions (#201, #202). As of today, I have started to ask people to send me logos that all have the same color scheme so it is easier for me to compare apples to apples. It wont necessarily be the final color scheme, but at least it will even the playing field so I can pick it on design instead of on colors. So for yours, can you submit both of yours (#201 #202) as just plain white text (no gradient) on a solid background of #79784c ?
Hi! Thanks for the feedback. Here are the two designs I created in white on the background color you requested. You have a lot to choose from here! I'm sure it won't be easy. Please let me know if you have any additional requests. Thanks for your consideration.